William Walker v. Capstone Building Corporation
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
REL:
05/04/2012
NOTICE: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o f o r m a l r e v i s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e
a d v a n c e s h e e t s o f Southern Reporter.
Readers a r e requested t o n o t i f y t h e
R e p o r t e r o f D e c i s i o n s , A l a b a m a A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s , 300 D e x t e r A v e n u e , M o n t g o m e r y ,
Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 2 2 9 - 0 6 4 9 ) , o f any t y p o g r a p h i c a l o r o t h e r e r r o r s , i n
o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may b e made b e f o r e t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n S o u t h e r n
Reporter.
ALABAMA
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS
OCTOBER TERM,
2011-2012
2081153
William
Walker
v.
Capstone B u i l d i n g C o r p o r a t i o n
Appeal
After
THOMPSON,
from
Tuscaloosa C i r c u i t
(CV-07-900226)
Remand f r o m
Presiding
t h e A l a b a m a Supreme
judgment
Court
Judge.
On M a r c h 2 6 , 2 0 1 0 , t h i s
summary
Court
i n favor
i n s o f a r as i t c o n c l u d e d
court
reversed
o f Capstone
thet r i a l
Building
court's
Corporation
that W i l l i a m Walker's wantonness c l a i m
2081153
is
barred
Supreme
parte
by
a two-year
Court
Capstone
has
statute
reversed
So. 3d ___ ( A l a . 2 0 1 2 ) .
the
Supreme
is
hereby
the judgment
B u i l d i n g Corp.,
___
Court's
opinion,
of l i m i t a t i o n s .
of
[Ms. 1 0 9 0 9 6 6 ,
On r e m a n d ,
this
The
court.
March
16,
and i n c o m p l i a n c e
the judgment
of the t r i a l
affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Pittman,
Bryan,
Thomas, and M o o r e ,
Alabama
J J . , concur.
Ex
2012]
with
court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
