§ 1221. — Individual right of action in certain reprisal cases.
Code Resources
Search this Code
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access
[wais.access.gpo.gov]
[Laws in effect as of January 24, 2002]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between
January 24, 2002 and December 19, 2002]
[CITE: 5USC1221]
TITLE 5--GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES
PART II--CIVIL SERVICE FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
CHAPTER 12--MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL,
AND EMPLOYEE RIGHT OF ACTION
SUBCHAPTER III--INDIVIDUAL RIGHT OF ACTION IN CERTAIN REPRISAL CASES
Sec. 1221. Individual right of action in certain reprisal cases
(a) Subject to the provisions of subsection (b) of this section and
subsection 1214(a)(3), an employee, former employee, or applicant for
employment may, with respect to any personnel action taken, or proposed
to be taken, against such employee, former employee, or applicant for
employment, as a result of a prohibited personnel practice described in
section 2302(b)(8), seek corrective action from the Merit Systems
Protection Board.
(b) This section may not be construed to prohibit any employee,
former employee, or applicant for employment from seeking corrective
action from the Merit Systems Protection Board before seeking corrective
action from the Special Counsel, if such employee, former employee, or
applicant for employment has the right to appeal directly to the Board
under any law, rule, or regulation.
(c)(1) Any employee, former employee, or applicant for employment
seeking corrective action under subsection (a) may request that the
Board order a stay of the personnel action involved.
(2) Any stay requested under paragraph (1) shall be granted within
10 calendar days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays)
after the date the request is made, if the Board determines that such a
stay would be appropriate.
(3)(A) The Board shall allow any agency which would be subject to a
stay under this subsection to comment to the Board on such stay request.
(B) Except as provided in subparagraph (C), a stay granted under
this subsection shall remain in effect for such period as the Board
determines to be appropriate.
(C) The Board may modify or dissolve a stay under this subsection at
any time, if the Board determines that such a modification or
dissolution is appropriate.
(d)(1) At the request of an employee, former employee, or applicant
for employment seeking corrective action under subsection (a), the Board
shall issue a subpoena for the attendance and testimony of any person or
the production of documentary or other evidence from any person if the
Board finds that the testimony or production requested is not unduly
burdensome and appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of
admissible evidence.
(2) A subpoena under this subsection may be issued, and shall be
enforced, in the same manner as applies in the case of subpoenas under
section 1204.
(e)(1) Subject to the provisions of paragraph (2), in any case
involving an alleged prohibited personnel practice as described under
section 2302(b)(8), the Board shall order such corrective action as the
Board considers appropriate if the employee, former employee, or
applicant for employment has demonstrated that a disclosure described
under section 2302(b)(8) was a contributing factor in the personnel
action which was taken or is to be taken against such employee, former
employee, or applicant. The employee may demonstrate that the disclosure
was a contributing factor in the personnel action through circumstantial
evidence, such as evidence that--
(A) the official taking the personnel action knew of the
disclosure; and
(B) the personnel action occurred within a period of time such
that a reasonable person could conclude that the disclosure was a
contributing factor in the personnel action.
(2) Corrective action under paragraph (1) may not be ordered if the
agency demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that it would have
taken the same personnel action in the absence of such disclosure.
(f)(1) A final order or decision shall be rendered by the Board as
soon as practicable after the commencement of any proceeding under this
section.
(2) A decision to terminate an investigation under subchapter II may
not be considered in any action or other proceeding under this section.
(3) If, based on evidence presented to it under this section, the
Merit Systems Protection Board determines that there is reason to
believe that a current employee may have committed a prohibited
personnel practice, the Board shall refer the matter to the Special
Counsel to investigate and take appropriate action under section 1215.
(g)(1)(A) If the Board orders corrective action under this section,
such corrective action may include--
(i) that the individual be placed, as nearly as possible, in the
position the individual would have been in had the prohibited
personnel practice not occurred; and
(ii) back pay and related benefits, medical costs incurred,
travel expenses, and any other reasonable and foreseeable
consequential changes.
(B) Corrective action shall include attorney's fees and costs as
provided for under paragraphs (2) and (3).
(2) If an employee, former employee, or applicant for employment is
the prevailing party before the Merit Systems Protection Board, and the
decision is based on a finding of a prohibited personnel practice, the
agency involved shall be liable to the employee, former employee, or
applicant for reasonable attorney's fees and any other reasonable costs
incurred.
(3) If an employee, former emloyee,\1\ or applicant for employment
is the prevailing party in an appeal from the Merit Systems Protection
Board, the agency involved shall be liable to the employee, former
employee, or applicant for reasonable attorney's fees and any other
reasonable costs incurred, regardless of the basis of the decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ So in original. Probably should be ``employee,''.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(h)(1) An employee, former employee, or applicant for employment
adversely affected or aggrieved by a final order or decision of the
Board under this section may obtain judicial review of the order or
decision.
(2) A petition for review under this subsection shall be filed with
such court, and within such time, as provided for under section 7703(b).
(i) Subsections (a) through (h) shall apply in any proceeding
brought under section 7513(d) if, or to the extent that, a prohibited
personnel practice as defined in section 2302(b)(8) is alleged.
(j) In determining the appealability of any case involving an
allegation made by an individual under the provisions of this chapter,
neither the status of an individual under any retirement system
established under a Federal statute nor any election made by such
individual under any such system may be taken into account.
(Added Pub. L. 101-12, Sec. 3(a)(13), Apr. 10, 1989, 103 Stat. 29;
amended Pub. L. 103-424, Secs. 4, 8(b), Oct. 29, 1994, 108 Stat. 4363,
4365.)
Amendments
1994--Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 103-424, Sec. 4(a), added par. (1) and
struck out former par. (1) which read as follows: ``At the request of an
employee, former employee, or applicant for employment seeking
corrective action under subsection (a), the Board may issue a subpoena
for the attendance and testimony of any person or the production of
documentary or other evidence from any person if the Board finds that
such subpoena is necessary for the development of relevant evidence.''
Subsec. (e)(1). Pub. L. 103-424, Sec. 4(b), which directed the
amendment of section 1221(e)(1), without specifying the Code title to be
amended, by inserting at end ``The employee may demonstrate that the
disclosure was a contributing factor in the personnel action through
circumstantial evidence, such as evidence that--
``(A) the official taking the personnel action knew of the
disclosure; and
``(B) the personnel action occurred within a period of time such
that a reasonable person could conclude that the disclosure was a
contributing factor in the personnel action.'', was executed to
subsec. (e)(1) of this section to reflect the probable intent of
Congress.
Subsec. (f)(3). Pub. L. 103-424, Sec. 4(c), added par. (3).
Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 103-424, Sec. 8(b), added par. (1) and
redesignated former pars. (1) and (2) as (2) and (3), respectively.
Effective Date
Subchapter effective 90 days following Apr. 10, 1989, see section 11
of Pub. L. 101-12, set out as an Effective Date of 1989 Amendment note
under section 1201 of this title.
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in sections 1212, 1214, 1222, 2105,
2303, 7121 of this title; title 22 section 4139; title 49 section 40122.