Oregon Chapter 227
Chapter 227 — City Planning and ZoningDownload Full 2005 Oregon Revised Statutes (coming soon!)
Download Full 2007 Oregon Revised Statutes (coming soon!)
View 2005 version of these codes
Code Resources
Oregon Resources
Oregon Website
Oregon Governor
Oregon Legislature
Oregon Courts
Search this Code
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Chapter 227 —
City Planning and Zoning
2007 EDITION
CITY PLANNING AND ZONING
CITIES
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
227.010 Definition
for ORS 227.030 to 227.300
227.020 Authority
to create planning commission
227.030 Membership
227.090 Powers
and duties of commission
227.095 Definitions
for ORS 227.100 and 227.110
227.100 Submission
of plats for subdivisions and plans for street alterations and public buildings
to commission; report
227.110 City
approval prior to recording of subdivision plats and plats or deeds dedicating
land to public use within six miles of city; exception
227.120 Procedure
and approval for renaming streets
PLANNING AND ZONING HEARINGS AND REVIEW
227.160 Definitions
for ORS 227.160 to 227.186
227.165 Planning
and zoning hearings officers; duties and powers
227.170 Hearing
procedure; rules
227.172 Siting
casino in incorporated city
227.173 Basis
for decision on permit application or expedited land division; statement of
reasons for approval or denial
227.175 Application
for permit or zone change; fees; consolidated procedure; hearing; approval
criteria; decision without hearing
227.178 Final
action on certain applications required within 120 days; procedure; exceptions;
refund of fees
227.179 Petition
for writ of mandamus authorized when city fails to take final action on land
use application within 120 days; jurisdiction; notice of petition
227.180 Review
of action on permit application; fees
227.181 Final
action required within 90 days following remand of land use decision
227.182 Petition
for writ of mandamus authorized when city fails to take final action within 90
days of remand of land use decision
227.184 Supplemental
application for remaining permitted uses following denial of initial
application
227.185 Transmission
tower; location; conditions
227.186 Notice
to property owners of hearing on certain zone change; form of notice;
exceptions; reimbursement of cost
227.187 Public
sale of copies of city comprehensive plan and land use regulations
SOLAR ACCESS ORDINANCES
227.190 Solar
access ordinances; purpose; standards
227.195 Effect
of land use regulations and comprehensive plans
DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCES
227.215 “Development”
defined; regulation of development
227.280 Enforcement
of development legislation
227.286 City
ordinances applicable to public property
227.290 Building
setback lines established by city council; criteria
227.300 Use
of eminent domain power to establish setback lines
WETLANDS DEVELOPMENT
227.350 Notice
of proposed wetlands development; exception; approval by city
TRUCK ROUTES
227.400 Truck
routes; procedures for establishment or revision; notice; hearing
RECYCLING CONTAINERS
227.450 Recycling
containers; recommendations for new construction
PERMITTED USES IN ZONES
227.500 Use
of real property for religious activity; city regulation of real property used
for religious activity
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
227.010
Definition for ORS 227.030 to 227.300. As used in ORS 227.030 to 227.300, “council” means a representative
legislative body. [Amended by 1975 c.767 §1]
227.020
Authority to create planning commission. (1) A city may create a planning commission for the city and provide
for its organization and operations.
(2) This section shall be liberally
construed and shall include the authority to create a joint planning commission
and to utilize an intergovernmental agency for planning as authorized by ORS
190.003 to 190.130. [Amended by 1973 c.739 §1; 1975 c.767 §2]
227.030
Membership. (1) Not more
than two members of a city planning commission may be city officers, who shall
serve as ex officio nonvoting members.
(2) A member of such a commission may be
removed by the appointing authority, after hearing, for misconduct or
nonperformance of duty.
(3) Any vacancy in such a commission shall
be filled by the appointing authority for the unexpired term of the predecessor
in the office.
(4) No more than two voting members of the
commission may engage principally in the buying, selling or developing of real
estate for profit as individuals, or be members of any partnership, or officers
or employees of any corporation, that engages principally in the buying,
selling or developing of real estate for profit. No more than two members shall
be engaged in the same kind of occupation, business, trade or profession. [Amended
by 1969 c.430 §1; 1973 c.739 §2; 1975 c.767 §3]
227.035 [1973 c.739 §5; renumbered 244.135 in 1993]
227.040 [Repealed by 1973 c.739 §13]
227.050 [Amended by 1969 c.430 §2; repealed by 1975
c.767 §16]
227.060 [Repealed by 1975 c.767 §16]
227.070 [Amended by 1969 c.430 §3; 1973 c.739 §3;
repealed by 1975 c.767 §16]
227.080 [Repealed by 1973 c.739 §13]
227.090
Powers and duties of commission. (1) Except as otherwise provided by the city council, a city planning
commission may:
(a) Recommend and make suggestions to the
council and to other public authorities concerning:
(A) The laying out, widening, extending
and locating of public thoroughfares, parking of vehicles, relief of traffic
congestion;
(B) Betterment of housing and sanitation
conditions;
(C) Establishment of districts for
limiting the use, height, area, bulk and other characteristics of buildings and
structures related to land development;
(D) Protection and assurance of access to
incident solar radiation; and
(E) Protection and assurance of access to
wind for potential future electrical generation or mechanical application.
(b) Recommend to the council and other
public authorities plans for regulating the future growth, development and
beautification of the city in respect to its public and private buildings and
works, streets, parks, grounds and vacant lots, and plans consistent with
future growth and development of the city in order to secure to the city and
its inhabitants sanitation, proper service of public utilities and
telecommunications utilities, including appropriate public incentives for
overall energy conservation and harbor, shipping and transportation facilities.
(c) Recommend to the council and other
public authorities plans for promotion, development and regulation of
industrial and economic needs of the community in respect to industrial
pursuits.
(d) Advertise the industrial advantages
and opportunities of the city and availability of real estate within the city
for industrial settlement.
(e) Encourage industrial settlement within
the city.
(f) Make economic surveys of present and
potential industrial needs of the city.
(g) Study needs of local industries with a
view to strengthening and developing them and stabilizing employment conditions.
(h) Do and perform all other acts and
things necessary or proper to carry out the provisions of ORS 227.010 to
227.170, 227.175 and 227.180.
(i) Study and propose such measures as are
advisable for promotion of the public interest, health, morals, safety,
comfort, convenience and welfare of the city and of the area within six miles
thereof.
(2) For the purposes of this section:
(a) “Incident solar radiation” means solar
energy falling upon a given surface area.
(b) “Wind” means the natural movement of
air at an annual average speed measured at a height of 10 meters of at least
eight miles per hour. [Amended by 1975 c.153 §3; 1975 c.767 §4; 1979 c.671 §3;
1981 c.590 §8; 1987 c.447 §118]
227.095
Definitions for ORS 227.100 and 227.110. As used in ORS 227.100 and 227.110, “subdivision” and “plat” have the
meanings given those terms in ORS 92.010. [1955 c.756 §28]
227.100
Submission of plats for subdivisions and plans for street alterations and
public buildings to commission; report. All subdivision plats located within the city limits, and all plans or
plats for vacating or laying out, widening, extending, parking and locating
streets or plans for public buildings shall first be submitted to the
commission by the city engineer or other proper municipal officer, and a report
thereon from the commission secured in writing before approval is given by the
proper municipal official. [Amended by 1955 c.756 §26]
227.110
City approval prior to recording of subdivision plats and plats or deeds
dedicating land to public use within six miles of city; exception. (1) All subdivision plats and all plats or
deeds dedicating land to public use in that portion of a county within six
miles outside the limits of any city shall first be submitted to the city
planning commission or, if no such commission exists, to the city engineer of
the city and approved by the commission or engineer before they shall be
recorded. However, unless otherwise provided in an urban growth area management
agreement jointly adopted by a city and county to establish procedures for
regulating land use outside the city limits and within an urban growth boundary
acknowledged under ORS 197.251, if the county governing body has adopted
ordinances or regulations for subdivisions and partitions under ORS 92.044,
land within the six-mile limit shall be under the jurisdiction of the county
for those purposes.
(2) It shall be unlawful to receive or
record such plat or replat or deed in any public office unless the same bears
thereon the approval, by indorsement, of such commission or city engineer.
However, the indorsement of the commission or city engineer of the city with
boundaries nearest the land such document affects shall satisfy the
requirements of this section in case the boundaries of more than one city are
within six miles of the property so mapped or described. If the governing
bodies of such cities mutually agree upon a boundary line establishing the
limits of the jurisdiction of the cities other than the line equidistant
between the cities and file the agreement with the recording officer of the
county containing such boundary line, the boundary line mutually agreed upon
shall become the limit of the jurisdiction of each city until superseded by a
new agreement between the cities or until one of the cities files with such
recording officer a written notification stating that the agreement shall no
longer apply. [Amended by 1955 c.756 §27; 1983 c.570 §5; 1991 c.763 §25]
227.120
Procedure and approval for renaming streets. Within six miles of the limits of any city, the commission, if there
is one, or if no such commission legally exists, then the city engineer, shall
recommend to the city council the renaming of any existing street, highway or
road, other than a county road or state highway, if in the judgment of the
commission, or if no such commission legally exists, then in the judgment of
the city engineer, such renaming is in the best interest of the city and the
six mile area. Upon receiving such recommendation the council shall afford persons
particularly interested, and the general public, an opportunity to be heard, at
a time and place to be specified in a notice of hearing published in a
newspaper of general circulation within the municipality and the six mile area
not less than once within the week prior to the week within which the hearing
is to be held. After such opportunity for hearing has been afforded, the city
council by ordinance shall rename the street or highway in accordance with the
recommendation or by resolution shall reject the recommendation. A certified
copy of each such ordinance shall be filed for record with the county clerk or
recorder, and a like copy shall be filed with the county assessor and county
surveyor. The county surveyor shall enter the new names of such streets and
roads in red ink on the county surveyor’s copy of any filed plat and tracing
thereof which may be affected, together with appropriate notations concerning
the same. The original plat may not be corrected or changed after it is
recorded with the county clerk. [Amended by 2001 c.173 §4]
227.130 [Repealed by 1975 c.767 §16]
227.140 [Repealed by 1975 c.767 §16]
227.150 [Repealed by 1975 c.767 §16]
PLANNING AND
ZONING HEARINGS AND REVIEW
227.160
Definitions for ORS 227.160 to 227.186. As used in ORS 227.160 to 227.186:
(1) “Hearings officer” means a planning
and zoning hearings officer appointed or designated by a city council under ORS
227.165.
(2) “Permit” means discretionary approval
of a proposed development of land, under ORS 227.215 or city legislation or
regulation. “Permit” does not include:
(a) A limited land use decision as defined
in ORS 197.015;
(b) A decision which determines the
appropriate zoning classification for a particular use by applying criteria or
performance standards defining the uses permitted within the zone, and the
determination applies only to land within an urban growth boundary;
(c) A decision which determines final
engineering design, construction, operation, maintenance, repair or
preservation of a transportation facility which is otherwise authorized by and
consistent with the comprehensive plan and land use regulations; or
(d) An action under ORS 197.360 (1). [1973
c.739 §6; 1975 c.767 §5; 1991 c.817 §8a; 1995 c.595 §13]
227.165
Planning and zoning hearings officers; duties and powers. A city may appoint one or more planning and
zoning hearings officers, to serve at the pleasure of the appointing authority.
Such an officer shall conduct hearings on applications for such classes of
permits and zone changes as the council designates. [1973 c.739 §7; 1975 c.767 §6]
227.170
Hearing procedure; rules.
(1) The city council shall prescribe one or more procedures for the conduct of
hearings on permits and zone changes.
(2) The city council shall prescribe one
or more rules stating that all decisions made by the council on permits and
zone changes will be based on factual information, including adopted
comprehensive plans and land use regulations. [1973 c.739 §8; 1975 c.767 §7;
1997 c.452 §3]
227.172
Siting casino in incorporated city. (1) As used in this section:
(a) “Casino” means a facility in which
casino games, as defined in ORS 167.117, are played for the purpose of
gambling.
(b) “Tribal casino” means a facility used
for:
(A) Class I gaming or class II gaming
regulated by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of October 17, 1988 (25 U.S.C.
2701 et seq.);
(B) Class III gaming conducted under a
tribal-state compact approved by the Secretary of the Interior under section
11(d)(8) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(8)); or
(C) Gaming conducted in accordance with
the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and federal regulations.
(2) A casino may not be sited on land in
an incorporated city unless the electors of the city approve the development.
(3) Before a permit, as defined in ORS
227.160, can be approved authorizing a proposed development of land in an
incorporated city as a site for a casino, the governing body of the city that
contains the site shall submit the question of siting the casino to the
electors of the city for approval or rejection.
(4) Subsections (2) and (3) of this
section do not apply to a tribal casino. [2007 c.724 §2]
227.173
Basis for decision on permit application or expedited land division; statement
of reasons for approval or denial. (1) Approval or denial of a discretionary permit application shall be
based on standards and criteria, which shall be set forth in the development
ordinance and which shall relate approval or denial of a discretionary permit
application to the development ordinance and to the comprehensive plan for the
area in which the development would occur and to the development ordinance and
comprehensive plan for the city as a whole.
(2) When an ordinance establishing
approval standards is required under ORS 197.307 to provide only clear and
objective standards, the standards must be clear and objective on the face of
the ordinance.
(3) Approval or denial of a permit
application or expedited land division shall be based upon and accompanied by a
brief statement that explains the criteria and standards considered relevant to
the decision, states the facts relied upon in rendering the decision and
explains the justification for the decision based on the criteria, standards
and facts set forth.
(4) Written notice of the approval or
denial shall be given to all parties to the proceeding. [1977 c.654 §5; 1979
c.772 §10b; 1991 c.817 §16; 1995 c.595 §29; 1997 c.844 §6; 1999 c.357 §3]
227.175
Application for permit or zone change; fees; consolidated procedure; hearing;
approval criteria; decision without hearing. (1) When required or authorized by a city, an owner of land may apply
in writing to the hearings officer, or such other person as the city council
designates, for a permit or zone change, upon such forms and in such a manner
as the city council prescribes. The governing body shall establish fees charged
for processing permits at an amount no more than the actual or average cost of
providing that service.
(2) The governing body of the city shall
establish a consolidated procedure by which an applicant may apply at one time
for all permits or zone changes needed for a development project. The
consolidated procedure shall be subject to the time limitations set out in ORS
227.178. The consolidated procedure shall be available for use at the option of
the applicant no later than the time of the first periodic review of the
comprehensive plan and land use regulations.
(3) Except as provided in subsection (10)
of this section, the hearings officer shall hold at least one public hearing on
the application.
(4) The application shall not be approved
unless the proposed development of land would be in compliance with the
comprehensive plan for the city and other applicable land use regulation or
ordinance provisions. The approval may include such conditions as are
authorized by ORS 227.215 or any city legislation.
(5) Hearings under this section may be
held only after notice to the applicant and other interested persons and shall
otherwise be conducted in conformance with the provisions of ORS 197.763.
(6) Notice of a public hearing on a zone
use application shall be provided to the owner of an airport, defined by the
Oregon Department of Aviation as a “public use airport” if:
(a) The name and address of the airport
owner has been provided by the Oregon Department of Aviation to the city
planning authority; and
(b) The property subject to the zone use
hearing is:
(A) Within 5,000 feet of the side or end
of a runway of an airport determined by the Oregon Department of Aviation to be
a “visual airport”; or
(B) Within 10,000 feet of the side or end
of the runway of an airport determined by the Oregon Department of Aviation to
be an “instrument airport.”
(7) Notwithstanding the provisions of
subsection (6) of this section, notice of a zone use hearing need only be
provided as set forth in subsection (6) of this section if the permit or zone
change would only allow a structure less than 35 feet in height and the
property is located outside of the runway “approach surface” as defined by the
Oregon Department of Aviation.
(8) If an application would change the
zone of property that includes all or part of a mobile home or manufactured
dwelling park as defined in ORS 446.003, the governing body shall give written
notice by first class mail to each existing mailing address for tenants of the
mobile home or manufactured dwelling park at least 20 days but not more than 40
days before the date of the first hearing on the application. The governing
body may require an applicant for such a zone change to pay the costs of such
notice.
(9) The failure of a tenant or an airport
owner to receive a notice which was mailed shall not invalidate any zone
change.
(10)(a)(A) The hearings officer or such
other person as the governing body designates may approve or deny an
application for a permit without a hearing if the hearings officer or other
designated person gives notice of the decision and provides an opportunity for
any person who is adversely affected or aggrieved, or who is entitled to notice
under paragraph (c) of this subsection, to file an appeal.
(B) Written notice of the decision shall
be mailed to those persons described in paragraph (c) of this subsection.
(C) Notice under this subsection shall
comply with ORS 197.763 (3)(a), (c), (g) and (h) and shall describe the nature
of the decision. In addition, the notice shall state that any person who is
adversely affected or aggrieved or who is entitled to written notice under
paragraph (c) of this subsection may appeal the decision by filing a written
appeal in the manner and within the time period provided in the city’s land use
regulations. A city may not establish an appeal period that is less than 12
days from the date the written notice of decision required by this subsection
was mailed. The notice shall state that the decision will not become final
until the period for filing a local appeal has expired. The notice also shall
state that a person who is mailed written notice of the decision cannot appeal
the decision directly to the Land Use Board of Appeals under ORS 197.830.
(D) An appeal from a hearings officer’s
decision made without hearing under this subsection shall be to the planning
commission or governing body of the city. An appeal from such other person as
the governing body designates shall be to a hearings officer, the planning
commission or the governing body. In either case, the appeal shall be to a de
novo hearing.
(E) The de novo hearing required by
subparagraph (D) of this paragraph shall be the initial evidentiary hearing
required under ORS 197.763 as the basis for an appeal to the Land Use Board of
Appeals. At the de novo hearing:
(i) The applicant and other parties shall
have the same opportunity to present testimony, arguments and evidence as they
would have had in a hearing under subsection (3) of this section before the
decision;
(ii) The presentation of testimony,
arguments and evidence shall not be limited to issues raised in a notice of
appeal; and
(iii) The decision maker shall consider
all relevant testimony, arguments and evidence that are accepted at the
hearing.
(b) If a local government provides only a
notice of the opportunity to request a hearing, the local government may charge
a fee for the initial hearing. The maximum fee for an initial hearing shall be
the cost to the local government of preparing for and conducting the appeal, or
$250, whichever is less. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon
subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. The fee
allowed in this paragraph shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or
community organizations recognized by the governing body and whose boundaries
include the site.
(c)(A) Notice of a decision under
paragraph (a) of this subsection shall be provided to the applicant and to the
owners of record of property on the most recent property tax assessment roll
where such property is located:
(i) Within 100 feet of the property that
is the subject of the notice when the subject property is wholly or in part within
an urban growth boundary;
(ii) Within 250 feet of the property that
is the subject of the notice when the subject property is outside an urban
growth boundary and not within a farm or forest zone; or
(iii) Within 750 feet of the property that
is the subject of the notice when the subject property is within a farm or
forest zone.
(B) Notice shall also be provided to any
neighborhood or community organization recognized by the governing body and
whose boundaries include the site.
(C) At the discretion of the applicant,
the local government also shall provide notice to the Department of Land
Conservation and Development.
(11) A decision described in ORS 227.160
(2)(b) shall:
(a) Be entered in a registry available to
the public setting forth:
(A) The street address or other easily
understood geographic reference to the subject property;
(B) The date of the decision; and
(C) A description of the decision made.
(b) Be subject to the jurisdiction of the
Land Use Board of Appeals in the same manner as a limited land use decision.
(c) Be subject to the appeal period
described in ORS 197.830 (5)(b).
(12) At the option of the applicant, the
local government shall provide notice of the decision described in ORS 227.160
(2)(b) in the manner required by ORS 197.763 (2), in which case an appeal to
the board shall be filed within 21 days of the decision. The notice shall
include an explanation of appeal rights.
(13) Notwithstanding other requirements of
this section, limited land use decisions shall be subject to the requirements
set forth in ORS 197.195 and 197.828. [1973 c.739 §§9,10; 1975 c.767 §8; 1983
c.827 §24; 1985 c.473 §15; 1987 c.106 §3; 1987 c.729 §18; 1989 c.648 §63; 1991
c.612 §21; 1991 c.817 §6; 1995 c.692 §2; 1997 c.844 §5; 1999 c.621 §2; 1999 c.935
§24; 2001 c.397 §2]
227.178
Final action on certain applications required within 120 days; procedure;
exceptions; refund of fees.
(1) Except as provided in subsections (3) and (5) of this section, the
governing body of a city or its designee shall take final action on an
application for a permit, limited land use decision or zone change, including
resolution of all appeals under ORS 227.180, within 120 days after the
application is deemed complete.
(2) If an application for a permit,
limited land use decision or zone change is incomplete, the governing body or
its designee shall notify the applicant in writing of exactly what information
is missing within 30 days of receipt of the application and allow the applicant
to submit the missing information. The application shall be deemed complete for
the purpose of subsection (1) of this section upon receipt by the governing
body or its designee of:
(a) All of the missing information;
(b) Some of the missing information and
written notice from the applicant that no other information will be provided;
or
(c) Written notice from the applicant that
none of the missing information will be provided.
(3)(a) If the application was complete
when first submitted or the applicant submits the requested additional information
within 180 days of the date the application was first submitted and the city
has a comprehensive plan and land use regulations acknowledged under ORS
197.251, approval or denial of the application shall be based upon the
standards and criteria that were applicable at the time the application was
first submitted.
(b) If the application is for industrial
or traded sector development of a site identified under section 12, chapter
800, Oregon Laws 2003, and proposes an amendment to the comprehensive plan,
approval or denial of the application must be based upon the standards and
criteria that were applicable at the time the application was first submitted,
provided the application complies with paragraph (a) of this subsection.
(4) On the 181st day after first being
submitted, the application is void if the applicant has been notified of the
missing information as required under subsection (2) of this section and has
not submitted:
(a) All of the missing information;
(b) Some of the missing information and
written notice that no other information will be provided; or
(c) Written notice that none of the
missing information will be provided.
(5) The 120-day period set in subsection
(1) of this section may be extended for a specified period of time at the
written request of the applicant. The total of all extensions may not exceed
245 days.
(6) The 120-day period set in subsection
(1) of this section applies:
(a) Only to decisions wholly within the
authority and control of the governing body of the city; and
(b) Unless the parties have agreed to
mediation as described in ORS 197.319 (2)(b).
(7) Notwithstanding subsection (6) of this
section, the 120-day period set in subsection (1) of this section does not
apply to an amendment to an acknowledged comprehensive plan or land use
regulation or adoption of a new land use regulation that was forwarded to the
Director of the Department of Land Conservation and Development under ORS
197.610 (1).
(8) Except when an applicant requests an
extension under subsection (5) of this section, if the governing body of the
city or its designee does not take final action on an application for a permit,
limited land use decision or zone change within 120 days after the application
is deemed complete, the city shall refund to the applicant, subject to the
provisions of subsection (9) of this section, either the unexpended portion of
any application fees or deposits previously paid or 50 percent of the total
amount of such fees or deposits, whichever is greater. The applicant is not
liable for additional governmental fees incurred subsequent to the payment of
such fees or deposits. However, the applicant is responsible for the costs of
providing sufficient additional information to address relevant issues
identified in the consideration of the application.
(9)(a) To obtain a refund under subsection
(8) of this section, the applicant may either:
(A) Submit a written request for payment,
either by mail or in person, to the city or its designee; or
(B) Include the amount claimed in a
mandamus petition filed under ORS 227.179. The court shall award an amount owed
under this section in its final order on the petition.
(b) Within seven calendar days of
receiving a request for a refund, the city or its designee shall determine the
amount of any refund owed. Payment, or notice that no payment is due, shall be
made to the applicant within 30 calendar days of receiving the request. Any
amount due and not paid within 30 calendar days of receipt of the request shall
be subject to interest charges at the rate of one percent per month, or a
portion thereof.
(c) If payment due under paragraph (b) of
this subsection is not paid within 120 days after the city or its designee
receives the refund request, the applicant may file an action for recovery of
the unpaid refund. In an action brought by a person under this paragraph, the
court shall award to a prevailing applicant, in addition to the relief provided
in this section, reasonable attorney fees and costs at trial and on appeal. If
the city or its designee prevails, the court shall award reasonable attorney
fees and costs at trial and on appeal if the court finds the petition to be
frivolous.
(10) A city may not compel an applicant to
waive the 120-day period set in subsection (1) of this section or to waive the
provisions of subsection (8) of this section or ORS 227.179 as a condition for
taking any action on an application for a permit, limited land use decision or
zone change except when such applications are filed concurrently and considered
jointly with a plan amendment. [1983 c.827 §27; 1989 c.761 §16; 1991 c.817 §15;
1995 c.812 §3; 1997 c.844 §8; 1999 c.533 §8; 2003 c.150 §1; 2003 c.800 §31]
227.179
Petition for writ of mandamus authorized when city fails to take final action
on land use application within 120 days; jurisdiction; notice of petition. (1) Except when an applicant requests an
extension under ORS 227.178 (5), if the governing body of a city or its
designee does not take final action on an application for a permit, limited
land use decision or zone change within 120 days after the application is
deemed complete, the applicant may file a petition for a writ of mandamus under
ORS 34.130 in the circuit court of the county where the application was
submitted to compel the governing body or its designee to issue the approval.
(2) The governing body shall retain
jurisdiction to make a land use decision on the application until a petition
for a writ of mandamus is filed. Upon filing a petition under ORS 34.130,
jurisdiction for all decisions regarding the application, including settlement,
shall be with the circuit court.
(3) A person who files a petition for a
writ of mandamus under this section shall provide written notice of the filing
to all persons who would be entitled to notice under ORS 197.763 and to any
person who participated orally or in writing in any evidentiary hearing on the
application held prior to the filing of the petition. The notice shall be
mailed or hand delivered on the same day the petition is filed.
(4) If the governing body does not take
final action on an application within 120 days of the date the application is
deemed complete, the applicant may elect to proceed with the application
according to the applicable provisions of the local comprehensive plan and land
use regulations or to file a petition for a writ of mandamus under this
section. If the applicant elects to proceed according to the local plan and
regulations, the applicant may not file a petition for a writ of mandamus
within 14 days after the governing body makes a preliminary decision, provided
a final written decision is issued within 14 days of the preliminary decision.
(5) The court shall issue a peremptory
writ unless the governing body or any intervenor shows that the approval would violate
a substantive provision of the local comprehensive plan or land use regulations
as those terms are defined in ORS 197.015. The writ may specify conditions of
approval that would otherwise be allowed by the local comprehensive plan or
land use regulations. [1999 c.533 §10; 2003 c.150 §2]
227.180
Review of action on permit application; fees. (1)(a) A party aggrieved by the action of a hearings officer may
appeal the action to the planning commission or council of the city, or both,
however the council prescribes. The appellate authority on its own motion may
review the action. The procedure for such an appeal or review shall be
prescribed by the council, but shall:
(A) Not require that the appeal be filed
within less than seven days after the date the governing body mails or delivers
the decision of the hearings officer to the parties;
(B) Require a hearing at least for
argument; and
(C) Require that upon appeal or review the
appellate authority consider the record of the hearings officer’s action. That
record need not set forth evidence verbatim.
(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this
subsection, the council may provide that the decision of a hearings officer or
other decision-making authority in a proceeding for a discretionary permit or
zone change is the final determination of the city.
(c) The governing body may prescribe, by
ordinance or regulation, fees to defray the costs incurred in acting upon an
appeal from a hearings officer, planning commission or other designated person.
The amount of the fee shall be reasonable and shall be no more than the average
cost of such appeals or the actual cost of the appeal, excluding the cost of
preparation of a written transcript. The governing body may establish a fee for
the preparation of a written transcript. The fee shall be reasonable and shall
not exceed the actual cost of preparing the transcript up to $500. In lieu of a
transcript prepared by the governing body and the fee therefor, the governing
body shall allow any party to an appeal proceeding held on the record to
prepare a transcript of relevant portions of the proceedings conducted at a
lower level at the party’s own expense. If an appellant prevails at a hearing
or on appeal, the transcript fee shall be refunded.
(2) A party aggrieved by the final
determination in a proceeding for a discretionary permit or zone change may
have the determination reviewed under ORS 197.830 to 197.845.
(3) No decision or action of a planning
commission or city governing body shall be invalid due to ex parte contact or
bias resulting from ex parte contact with a member of the decision-making body,
if the member of the decision-making body receiving the contact:
(a) Places on the record the substance of
any written or oral ex parte communications concerning the decision or action;
and
(b) Has a public announcement of the
content of the communication and of the parties’ right to rebut the substance
of the communication made at the first hearing following the communication
where action will be considered or taken on the subject to which the
communication related.
(4) A communication between city staff and
the planning commission or governing body shall not be considered an ex parte
contact for the purposes of subsection (3) of this section.
(5) Subsection (3) of this section does
not apply to ex parte contact with a hearings officer. [1973 c.739 §§11,12;
1975 c.767 §9; 1979 c.772 §12; 1981 c.748 §43; 1983 c.656 §2; 1983 c.827 §25;
1991 c.817 §12]
227.181
Final action required within 90 days following remand of land use decision. (1) Pursuant to a final order of the Land
Use Board of Appeals under ORS 197.830 remanding a decision to a city, the
governing body of the city or its designee shall take final action on an
application for a permit, limited land use decision or zone change within 90
days of the effective date of the final order issued by the board. For purposes
of this subsection, the effective date of the final order is the last day for
filing a petition for judicial review of a final order of the board under ORS
197.850 (3). If judicial review of a final order of the board is sought under
ORS 197.830, the 90-day period established under this subsection shall not
begin until final resolution of the judicial review.
(2)(a) In addition to the requirements of
subsection (1) of this section, the 90-day period established under subsection
(1) of this section shall not begin until the applicant requests in writing
that the city proceed with the application on remand.
(b) The 90-day period may be extended for
a reasonable period of time at the request of the applicant.
(3) The 90-day period established under
subsection (1) of this section applies only to decisions wholly within the
authority and control of the governing body of the city.
(4) Subsection (1) of this section does
not apply to a remand proceeding concerning an amendment to an acknowledged
comprehensive plan or land use regulation or the adoption of a new land use
regulation that was forwarded to the Director of the Department of Land
Conservation and Development under ORS 197.610. [1999 c.545 §5]
227.182
Petition for writ of mandamus authorized when city fails to take final action
within 90 days of remand of land use decision. (1) If the governing body of a city or its
designee fails to take final action on an application for a permit, limited
land use decision or zone change within 90 days as provided in ORS 227.181, the
applicant may file a petition for a writ of mandamus as provided in ORS 34.105
to 34.240. The court shall set the matter for trial as soon as practicable but
not more than 15 days from the date a responsive pleading pursuant to ORS
34.170 is filed, unless the court has been advised by the parties that the
matter has been settled.
(2) A writ of mandamus issued under this
section shall order the governing body of the city or its designee to make a
final determination on the application. The court, in its discretion, may order
such remedy as the court determines appropriate.
(3) In a mandamus proceeding under this
section the court shall award court costs and attorney fees to an applicant who
prevails on a petition under this section. [1999 c.545 §6]
227.184
Supplemental application for remaining permitted uses following denial of
initial application. (1) A
person whose application for a permit is denied by the governing body of a city
or its designee under ORS 227.178 may submit to the city a supplemental
application for any or all other uses allowed under the city’s comprehensive
plan and land use regulations in the zone that was the subject of the denied
application.
(2) The governing body of a city or its
designee shall take final action on a supplemental application submitted under
this section, including resolution of all appeals, within 240 days after the
application is deemed complete. Except that 240 days shall substitute for 120
days, all other applicable provisions of ORS 227.178 shall apply to a
supplemental application submitted under this section.
(3) A supplemental application submitted
under this section shall include a request for any rezoning or zoning variance
that may be required to issue a permit under the city’s comprehensive plan and
land use regulations.
(4) The governing body of a city or its
designee shall adopt specific findings describing the reasons for approving or
denying:
(a) A use for which approval is sought
under this section; and
(b) A rezoning or variance requested in
the application. [1999 c.648 §4]
227.185
Transmission tower; location; conditions. The governing body of a city or its designate may allow the
establishment of a transmission tower over 200 feet in height in any zone
subject to reasonable conditions imposed by the governing body or its
designate. [1983 c.827 §27a]
227.186
Notice to property owners of hearing on certain zone change; form of notice;
exceptions; reimbursement of cost. (1) As used in this section, “owner” means the owner of the title to
real property or the contract purchaser of real property, of record as shown on
the last available complete tax assessment roll.
(2) All legislative acts relating to
comprehensive plans, land use planning or zoning adopted by a city shall be by
ordinance.
(3) Except as provided in subsection (6)
of this section, at least 20 days but not more than 40 days before the date of
the first hearing on an ordinance that proposes to amend an existing
comprehensive plan or any element thereof, or to adopt a new comprehensive
plan, a city shall cause a written individual notice of a land use change to be
mailed to each owner whose property would have to be rezoned in order to comply
with the amended or new comprehensive plan if the ordinance becomes effective.
(4) At least 20 days but not more than 40
days before the date of the first hearing on an ordinance that proposes to
rezone property, a city shall cause a written individual notice of a land use
change to be mailed to the owner of each lot or parcel of property that the
ordinance proposes to rezone.
(5) An additional individual notice of
land use change required by subsection (3) or (4) of this section shall be
approved by the city and shall describe in detail how the proposed ordinance
would affect the use of the property. The notice shall:
(a) Contain substantially the following
language in boldfaced type across the top of the face page extending from the
left margin to the right margin:
______________________________________________________________________________
This is to notify you that (city) has
proposed a land use regulation that may affect the permissible uses of your
property and other properties.
______________________________________________________________________________
(b) Contain substantially the following
language in the body of the notice:
______________________________________________________________________________
On (date of public hearing), (city) will
hold a public hearing regarding the adoption of Ordinance Number_____. The
(city) has determined that adoption of this ordinance may affect the
permissible uses of your property, and other properties in the affected zone,
and may change the value of your property.
Ordinance Number _____ is available for
inspection at the
For additional information concerning
Ordinance Number_____, you may call the (city) Planning Department at ___-___.
______________________________________________________________________________
(6) At least 30 days prior to the adoption
or amendment of a comprehensive plan or land use regulation by a city pursuant
to a requirement of periodic review of the comprehensive plan under ORS
197.628, 197.633 and 197.636, the city shall cause a written individual notice
of the land use change to be mailed to the owner of each lot or parcel that
will be rezoned as a result of the adoption or enactment. The notice shall
describe in detail how the ordinance or plan amendment may affect the use of
the property. The notice also shall:
(a) Contain substantially the following
language in boldfaced type across the top of the face page extending from the
left margin to the right margin:
______________________________________________________________________________
This is to notify you that (city) has
proposed a land use regulation that may affect the permissible uses of your
property and other properties.
______________________________________________________________________________
(b) Contain substantially the following
language in the body of the notice:
______________________________________________________________________________
As a result of an order of the Land
Conservation and Development Commission, (city) has proposed Ordinance
Number _____. (City) has determined that the adoption of this ordinance
may affect the permissible uses of your property, and other properties in the
affected zone, and may change the value of your property.
Ordinance Number _____ will become
effective on (date).
Ordinance Number _____ is available for
inspection at the
For additional information concerning
Ordinance Number_____, you may call the (city) Planning Department at ___-___.
______________________________________________________________________________
(7) Notice provided under this section may
be included with the tax statement required under ORS 311.250.
(8) Notwithstanding subsection (7) of this
section, a city may provide notice of a hearing at any time provided notice is
mailed by first class mail or bulk mail to all persons for whom notice is
required under subsections (3) and (4) of this section.
(9) For purposes of this section, property
is rezoned when the city:
(a) Changes the base zoning classification
of the property; or
(b) Adopts or amends an ordinance in a
manner that limits or prohibits land uses previously allowed in the affected
zone.
(10) The provisions of this section do not
apply to legislative acts of the governing body of the city resulting from
action of the Legislative Assembly or the Land Conservation and Development
Commission for which notice is provided under ORS 197.047 or resulting from an
order of a court of competent jurisdiction.
(11) The governing body of the city is not
required to provide more than one notice under this section to a person who
owns more than one lot or parcel affected by a change to the local
comprehensive plan or land use regulation.
(12) The Department of Land Conservation
and Development shall reimburse a city for all usual and reasonable costs
incurred to provide notice required under subsection (6) of this section. [1999
c.1 §3; 1999 c.348 §11; 2003 c.668 §3]
227.187
Public sale of copies of city comprehensive plan and land use regulations. A city shall maintain copies of its
comprehensive plan and land use regulations, as defined in ORS 197.015, for
sale to the public. [1991 c.363 §3]
SOLAR ACCESS
ORDINANCES
227.190 Solar access ordinances; purpose; standards. (1) City councils may adopt and implement solar access ordinances. The ordinances shall provide and protect to the extent feasible solar access to the south face of buildings during solar heating hours, taking into account latitude, topography, microclimate, existing development, existing vegetation and planned uses and densities. The city council shall consider for inclusion