New York Rules Of Tribunal.
Code Resources
New York Resources
New York Website
New York Governor
New York Legislature
New York Courts
Search this Code
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
§ 169. Rules of tribunal. Pursuant to chapter forty-five of this
charter, the tribunal shall promulgate rules of procedure, which shall
include, but not be limited to, rules on the following matters:
a. The types of representatives, such as accountants and enrolled
agents enrolled to practice before the internal revenue service, who may
appear, in addition to lawyers, on behalf of a petitioner before the
tribunal;
b. The form and contents of the petition, answer, affidavits and
memoranda to be submitted to the tribunal, and reasonable time
limitations for serving and filing such papers;
c. A procedure for promptly hearing and determining any matter
concerning jeopardy assessments or predecision warrants based thereon;
d. A procedural system guaranteeing a hearing in compliance with
chapter forty-five of this charter. Such a system shall be designed to
assign each petition filed with the tribunal to an administrative law
judge who shall hear and determine all matters pertaining to questions
of law or fact. Such a system also shall be designed to require the
tribunal to review en banc at the request of any party the determination
rendered by an administrative law judge, provided, however, that if
there is no such request for a review within thirty days of the giving
of notice of such determination by the administrative law judge, such
determination shall finally and irrevocably decide all the issues in the
proceeding before the administrative law judge and shall be considered a
final decision of the tribunal upon the expiration of such thirty-day
period, except that, notwithstanding any other provision of law, such
determination by the administrative law judge shall not be subject to
judicial review. Such a system shall provide that the tribunal may,
based upon the record of the hearing before the administrative law
judge, make its own findings of fact and conclusions of law and issue a
decision either affirming, reversing or modifying the determination of
the administrative law judge, or the tribunal may remand the case for
additional proceedings before the administrative law judge, as it may
deem appropriate. The tribunal in its discretion may grant oral
argument. Such a system shall provide that when the tribunal reviews a
matter en banc it must have a majority present and that not less than
two votes shall be necessary to take any action. Such a system also
shall provide for a pre-hearing conference at which settlement is
encouraged; reasonable discovery; and the submission of papers
addressing both the factual and legal merits in each proceeding;
e. A procedural system to be followed in cases in which the matter in
controversy is ten thousand dollars or less, exclusive of interest and
penalties. Such a system shall be designed to provide a simplified and
informal procedure for such small claims proceedings. The option to
proceed with a small claims hearing shall be exercised by the
petitioner. At any time prior to the conclusion of such hearing, a
petitioner may by written notice to the tribunal discontinue such small
claims hearing and request that the matter be transferred to a hearing
conducted before an administrative law judge. Such transfer shall be
effectuated by such written notice and such discontinuance shall be
without prejudice to any subsequent hearing before an administrative law
judge. The determination of the presiding officer conducting the small
claims hearing shall be conclusive upon all parties, shall be considered
a final decision of the tribunal and shall not be subject to review by
the tribunal sitting en banc or by any court of the state. However, the
tribunal may order a rehearing upon proof or allegation of misconduct by
the small claims presiding officer. Determinations issued by presiding
officers shall not be cited, shall not be considered as precedent nor
given any force or effect in any other proceedings conducted by the
tribunal or in any judicial proceedings conducted in this state; and
f. A method for notifying taxpayers and the commissioner of finance
of, and for publishing, the decisions of the tribunal.