2011 Connecticut Code
Title 21a Consumer Protection
Chapter 420b Dependency-Producing Drugs
Sec. 21a-278. (Formerly Sec. 19-480a). Penalty for illegal manufacture, distribution, sale, prescription or administration by non-drug-dependent person.

      Sec. 21a-278. (Formerly Sec. 19-480a). Penalty for illegal manufacture, distribution, sale, prescription or administration by non-drug-dependent person. (a) Any person who manufactures, distributes, sells, prescribes, dispenses, compounds, transports with the intent to sell or dispense, possesses with the intent to sell or dispense, offers, gives or administers to another person one or more preparations, compounds, mixtures or substances containing an aggregate weight of one ounce or more of heroin or methadone or an aggregate weight of one-half ounce or more of cocaine or one-half ounce or more of cocaine in a free-base form, or a substance containing five milligrams or more of lysergic acid diethylamide, except as authorized in this chapter, and who is not, at the time of such action, a drug-dependent person, shall be imprisoned for a minimum term of not less than five years or more than twenty years; and, a maximum term of life imprisonment. The execution of the mandatory minimum sentence imposed by the provisions of this subsection shall not be suspended, except the court may suspend the execution of such mandatory minimum sentence if at the time of the commission of the offense (1) such person was under the age of eighteen years, or (2) such person's mental capacity was significantly impaired, but not so impaired as to constitute a defense to prosecution.

      (b) Any person who manufactures, distributes, sells, prescribes, dispenses, compounds, transports with the intent to sell or dispense, possesses with the intent to sell or dispense, offers, gives or administers to another person any narcotic substance, hallucinogenic substance other than marijuana, amphetamine-type substance, or one kilogram or more of a cannabis-type substance, except as authorized in this chapter, and who is not, at the time of such action, a drug-dependent person, for a first offense shall be imprisoned not less than five years or more than twenty years; and for each subsequent offense shall be imprisoned not less than ten years or more than twenty-five years. The execution of the mandatory minimum sentence imposed by the provisions of this subsection shall not be suspended, except the court may suspend the execution of such mandatory minimum sentence if at the time of the commission of the offense (1) such person was under the age of eighteen years, or (2) such person's mental capacity was significantly impaired, but not so impaired as to constitute a defense to prosecution.

      (1971, P.A. 812, S. 1; 1972, P.A. 278, S. 25; P.A. 73-137, S. 10; P.A. 74-332, S. 1, 6; P.A. 87-373, S. 2; P.A. 01-195, S. 92, 181; P.A. 05-248, S. 8; P.A. 06-196, S. 254; P.A. 07-217, S. 97.)

      History: 1972 act substituted "substance" for "drug" and made provisions applicable to distributors and to hallucinogenic or amphetamine-type drugs; P.A. 73-137 substituted "such action" for "his arrest" and added proviso re life imprisonment penalty; P.A. 74-332 applied Subsec. (a) to substances containing specified amounts of heroin, methadone, cocaine or LSD, imposing minimum term of 5 to 20 years and maximum term of life imprisonment and added provisions re suspension of minimum term and added Subsec. (b) applicable to hallucinogenic, narcotic, amphetamine- or cannabis-type substances formerly dealt with in Subsec. (a), reducing minimum term for first offense from 10 to 5 years, replacing 15-year minimum and 30-year maximum for second offense and 35-year sentence for third or more offenses with 10-year minimum and 25-year maximum sentence for all offenses beyond the first and added provisions re suspension of minimum sentence; Sec. 19-480a transferred to Sec. 21a-278 in 1983; P.A. 87-373 amended Subsec. (a) to make provisions applicable to an aggregate weight of one-half gram or more of cocaine in a free-base form; P.A. 01-195 made technical changes in Subsecs. (a) and (b), effective July 11, 2001; P.A. 05-248 amended Subsec. (a) to decrease from one ounce to one-half ounce the minimum aggregate weight of cocaine and increase from one-half gram to one-half ounce the minimum aggregate weight of cocaine in a free-base form that subjects a person to the penalties of said Subsec.; P.A. 06-196 made technical changes in Subsec. (a), effective June 7, 2006; P.A. 07-217 made technical changes in Subsec. (b), effective July 12, 2007.

      See Sec. 21a-283a re authority of court to depart from prescribed mandatory minimum sentence.

      Annotations to former section 19-480a:

      Cited. 166 C. 439; Id., 620. This statute on its face does not violate the constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. 167 C. 328. Cited. 172 C. 16. Cited. 182 C. 142. Cited. 186 C. 26. Cited. 191 C. 360. Cited. 192 C. 383. Cited. 194 C. 589. Cited. 199 C. 359. Cited. 201 C. 605. Cited. 204 C. 377.

      Subsec. (a):

      Order directing defendant to submit to drug dependency examination is interlocutory and not appealable until conviction and final judgment. 180 C. 290. Cited. 194 C. 612. Cited. 197 C. 67. Cited. 200 C. 412.

      Subsec. (b):

      Cited. 179 C. 239; Id., 522. Question of burden of drug dependency is one of first impression; held: That proof of drug dependency constitutes an exemption under Sec. 19-474 and that burden of producing some substantial evidence of drug dependency rests initially on defendant. 182 C. 142. Cited. 187 C. 469. Cited. 188 C. 183. Cited. 197 C. 67.

      Annotations to present section:

      Cited. 191 C. 360. Cited. 192 C. 383. Cited. 194 C. 589. Cited. 204 C. 377. Cited. 212 C. 195. Cited. 221 C. 595. Cited. 224 C. 322. Cited. 227 C. 32. Cited. 231 C. 514; Id., 941. Cited. 235 C. 477; Id., 487.

      Cited. 9 CA 686. Cited. 13 CA 69. Cited. 19 CA 195. Cited. 26 CA 779. Cited. 27 CA 713. Cited. 32 CA 724. Cited. 35 CA 609. Cited. 36 CA 488; Id., 631. Cited. 41 CA 604. Cited. 42 CA 640. Defendant could not be convicted on one set of facts of both possession of narcotics by a person who is not drug-dependent and simple possession of narcotics and court ordered one sentence vacated. 60 CA 436.

      Subsec. (a):

      Cited. 200 C. 412. Cited. 211 C. 258. Institution of definite sentencing scheme for any felony under Sec. 53a-35a implicitly repealed indeterminate sentencing aspect of this section. 214 C. 378. Cited in error as Sec. 21-278(a). 227 C. 32. Cited. 237 C. 81. Cited. 239 C. 427.

      Cited. 10 CA 561. Cited. 11 CA 47. Cited. 15 CA 161. Cited. 16 CA 518. Cited. 18 CA 104. Cited. 30 CA 783. Cited. 45 CA 110. Design and effect of statute discussed, conviction for both possession and sale of narcotics does not violate prohibition against double jeopardy. 53 CA 661. Conviction of both possession of at least one-half gram of crack cocaine with intent to sell under this section and possession of powder cocaine with intent to sell under Sec. 21a-277 does not constitute double jeopardy. 75 CA 223. Evidence was sufficient to support conviction of possession with intent to sell. Id.

      Subsec. (b):

      Cited. 205 C. 560. Cited. 211 C. 258. Cited. 214 C. 378; Id., 692. Cited. 215 C. 667. Cited. 216 C. 150, see also 26 CA 423, 27 CA 291, 223 C. 902, and 225 C. 10, reversing judgment. Cited. 217 C. 811. Cited. 218 C. 458. Cited. 219 C. 529; Id., 752. Cited. 220 C. 6; Id., 628. Cited. 221 C. 518. Defendant bears burden of proving by preponderance of evidence that she was drug-dependent. Id., 595. Cited. Id., 925. Cited. 223 C. 283; Id., 461; Id., 703. Cited. 224 C. 253. Cited. 225 C. 650. Cited. 226 C. 514. Cited. 229 C. 60. Cited. 236 C. 176. Cited. 238 C. 380. Cited. 239 C. 629. Cited. 241 C. 322; Id., 650. Holdings in State v. Januszewski, 182 C. 142, and State v. Hart, 221 C. 595, that Subsec. creates an exception for drug-dependent persons within meaning of Sec. 21a-269 and the absence of drug dependency is not an element of the offense, upheld; holding in State v. Hart, 221 C. 595, that defendant must prove the exception of drug dependency by a preponderance of the evidence, upheld; requirement that defendant prove drug dependency by a preponderance of the evidence is not unconstitutional. 290 C. 24; judgment superseded, see Id., 602. Jury could reasonably conclude that defendant, who was not in exclusive possession of a vehicle containing narcotics, knew about and had control over narcotics found in the vehicle's center console from evidence that defendant closed the center console as police approached the vehicle and that a plastic bag, later determined to contain cocaine, was observed protruding from the corner of the console, and evidence that defendant was a narcotics dealer further supported the inference that defendant possessed the narcotics. 296 C. 62.

      Cited. 7 CA 588. Cited. 8 CA 469. Cited. 10 CA 347. Cited. 11 CA 140. Cited. 13 CA 40. Cited. 14 CA 146; Id., 807. Cited. 15 CA 519, see also 27 CA 291, 223 C. 902, and 225 C. 10, reversing judgment. Cited. 16 CA 18. Cited. 17 CA 104; Id., 114; Id., 556; Id., 635. Cited. 18 CA 175; Id., 184; Id., 716. Cited. 19 CA 265; Id., 277; Id., 478; judgment reversed, see 216 C. 150, see also 27 CA 291 and 225 C. 10, reversing judgment, 223 C. 902, and 225; Id., 626; Id., 640; 668. Cited. 20 CA 168; judgment reversed, see 215 C. 667; Id., 183; Id., 290; Id., 386; Id., 824. Cited. 21 CA 235; Id., 474; Id., 506; Id., 519. Cited. 22 CA 1; Id., 62; judgment reversed, see 219 C. 529; Id., 303; Id., 567; Id., 665. Cited. 23 CA 358; Id., 392; Id., 426; Id., 543; Id., 559; Id., 571; Id., 592; Id., 667; Id., 746; judgment reversed, see 221 C. 595. Cited. 24 CA 158; Id., 347; Id., 642; Id., 670; Id., 678. Cited. 25 CA 3; Id., 318; Id., 575. Cited. 26 CA 86; Id., 94; Id., 259; Id., 423, see also 27 CA 291, 223 C. 902 and 225 C. 10 et seq., reversing judgment; Id., 472; Id., 667. Cited. 27 C. 171; Id., 307; Id., 558; Id., 596. Cited. 28 CA 126; Id., 575. Cited. 29 CA 304; Id., 359; Id., 584; Id., 675; Id., 694. Cited. 30 CA 9; Id., 470; Id., 654; Id., 712; Id., 783. Cited. 31 CA 548. Cited. 32 CA 84; Id., 505; Id., 811; Id., 831; Id., 842. Cited. 33 CA 253; Id., 409; Id., 509; Id., 647. Cited. 34 CA 141; Id., 191; Id., 492; Id., 501; Id., 629. Cited. 35 CA 360. Cited. 36 CA 672. Cited. 37 CA 355; Id., 360; Id., 456; judgment reversed, see 236 C. 176; Id., 491. Cited. 38 CA 29; Id., 536. Cited. 39 CA 526; Id., 550. Cited. 41 CA 47; Id., 772. Cited. 42 CA 1; Id., 264; Id., 500; Id., 537; judgment reversed, see 241 C. 650; Id., 687; Id., 751. Cited. 43 CA 339. Cited. 45 CA 207; Id., 679. Court declines to distinguish prior case on due process challenge to unitary adjudication of sale of narcotics and drug dependency. 47 CA 86. Cited re admission of, and sufficiency of, evidence re conviction. 51 CA 824. Defendant's claim of drug dependency discussed and rejected. 62 CA 102. Trial court improperly failed to provide definition of "drug dependency" in accordance with the term's statutory definition or otherwise in its instructions to jury. 69 CA 505. Circumstantial evidence at trial provided adequate evidentiary basis for jury to find that substance at issue was LSD, which evidence included court's definition and description of LSD, defendant's statement re substance and manner of ingestion and effect of substance on person who ingested it. 85 CA 575. Defendant failed to demonstrate that his two convictions under section, resulting from searches on the same day, constituted double jeopardy because defendant was found with one stash of cocaine in his pocket, and a later search of his home found another stash of different purity, reflecting different purposes related to the cocaine. Defendant did not demonstrate a due process violation regarding jury instruction on nonexclusive possession of premises where narcotics were found. 93 CA 548. Circumstantial evidence that defendant picked up package and was engaged in illicit activity was insufficient to support conviction of possession of marijuana and possession with the intent to sell marijuana when essential element of offense, knowledge of the character of the illegal substance, was lacking. 98 CA 458. Evidence sufficient to show defendant possessed requisite knowledge for conviction under the statute. 110 CA 245.