2005 Connecticut Code - Sec. 7-308. Assumption of liability for damages caused by firemen or volunteer ambulance members.
Sec. 7-308. Assumption of liability for damages caused by firemen or volunteer ambulance members. (a) As used in this section, "municipality" shall have the
meaning ascribed to it by section 7-314; "fire duties" means those duties the performance
of which is defined in said section; "ambulance service" means "ambulance service"
as defined in section 7-314b; and "volunteer ambulance member" means "active member of an organization certified as a volunteer ambulance service in accordance with
section 19a-180" as defined in section 7-314b.
(1955, S. 266d; 1957, P.A. 401, S. 2; 1959, P.A. 446, S. 1; 1961, P.A. 355; February, 1965, P.A. 596; P.A. 98-108, S. 2; P.A. 03-278, S. 14.)
History: 1959 act substituted reference to Sec. 7-314 for reference to Sec. 7-309 and defined "fire duties"; 1961 act added provisions re damages caused employee by fellow employee; 1965 act added provisions re representation of municipality and fireman by same attorney; P.A. 98-108 divided existing section into Subsecs. (a) and (b) and added provisions re volunteer ambulance members (Revisor's note: In Subsec. (a) the phrase "`fire duties' mean ..." was changed editorially by the Revisors to "`fire duties' means ..." for grammatical correctness); P.A. 03-278 replaced "verdict" with "final judgment" and made technical changes in Subsec. (b), effective July 9, 2003.
Cited. 148 C. 27. Because reference in this section to an action by a "fireman" includes an action by that fireman's administratrix, trial court did not err in concluding that statute applied to bar the action. 187 C. 53 et seq. Section is capable of a reasonable interpretation; notwithstanding an inaccurate reference in it to a cause of action on the part of a deceased's "dependent" it is not unconstitutionally void for vagueness. Id. Section is not superseded by Sec. 31-293a which permits an action against a fellow employee for injuries arising out of the negligent operation of a motor vehicle. Id. Because the purpose of this section, which is to prevent double liability on the part of a municipality for the negligence of municipal firemen, bears a rational relationship to a legitimate governmental objective, it does not violate principles of equal protection. Id. Cited. 189 C. 550, 552. Cited. 196 C. 192, 200. Cited. 209 C. 273-278.
Cited. 12 CA 538-540, 542, 544-547; judgment reversed, see 209 C. 273-278.
To establish liability of municipality, plaintiff must allege and prove that conduct of employees was not wilful or wanton and that they were engaged in fire duties as defined in section 7-314. 23 CS 149. Necessity of allegation of presentation to municipality of demand is not satisfied by an allegation that required notice of injury was given municipality. Id. Cited. 22 CS 240; 23 CS 229. Cause of action against a fireman and a municipality is not limited to a living fireman but extends to his executor or administrator in case he dies. This section must be read in conjunction with section 52-599. 23 CS 321. Identity of unknown fireman can be ascertained for purpose of instituting action by invoking section 52-156 re depositions. 24 CS 452. Cited. 28 CS 507. Suit by firemen against another prohibited, when. 29 CS 420. Cited. 44 CS 230.
Disclaimer: These codes may not be the most recent version. Connecticut may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.