2000 WI 44
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
Complete Title Of Case:
In re the Commitment of Derek Miller: State of Wisconsin, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Derek Miller, Respondent-Appellant-Petitioner.
REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS Reported at: 229 Wis. 2d 567, 600 N.W.2d 224 (Ct. App. 1999-Published) May 26, 2000 April 6, 2000
Opinion Filed: Submitted on Briefs: Oral Argument:
Source of APPEAL COURT: COUNTY: JUDGE:
Circuit Milwaukee Jeffrey A. Kremers
JUSTICES: Concurred: Dissented: Not Participating:
For the respondent-appellant-petitioner there
were briefs and oral argument by Ellen Henak, assistant state public defender.
For the petitioner-respondent the cause was argued by Warren D. Weinstein, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney general.
2000 WI 44
This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports.
98-0394 : IN SUPREME COURT
STATE OF WISCONSIN In re the Commitment of Derek Miller: State of Wisconsin, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Derek Miller,
MAY 26, 2000
Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Supreme Court Madison, WI
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. improvidently granted. ¶1 briefs of PER CURIAM. the
After examination of the record and the and after hearing oral argument, we
conclude that the petition for review was improvidently granted.1 Derek Miller, the petitioner, stipulated that he was a sexually violent person and raised issues about his placement. Because
the statutes at issue have changed since the petitioner's case arose and the court of appeals has adequately addressed the
issues raised by the parties, we conclude that this case does not meet our standards for review.
State v. Miller, 229 Wis. 2d 567, 600 N.W.2d 224 (Ct. App.
By the Court.—The review of the decision of the court of appeals is dismissed as improvidently granted. ¶2 DAVID T. PROSSER, J., did not participate.