State Of Washington, Respondent V. Emilio Robert Hernandez, Appellant (Majority)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 68764-6-1 Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION EMILIO HERNANDEZ, Appellant. FILED: OCT 1 4 2013 Per Curiam. Emilio Hernandez appeals the sentence imposed following his convictions for first degree rape and first degree robbery. He contends the court erred in instructing the jury that it had a "duty" to return a guilty verdict if it found the elements of the crime were proved beyond a reasonable doubt. But the State correctly points out, and Hernandez does not dispute, that Hernandez invited the error by using the same language in his proposed instructions. Review is therefore precluded. City of Seattle v. Patu, 147 Wn.2d 717, 720-21, 58 P.3d 273 (2002). Hernandez has filed a pro se statement of additional grounds but fails to adequately describe the nature and occurrence of any alleged error as required by RAP 10.10(c). Affirmed. rv Z_ For the court: t*k j. & V -£ ¢ yyv\« J J~44e/ to
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
