Dianna L. Kay v. City of Norfolk

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Benton, Humphreys and Senior Judge Overton DIANNA L. KAY v. Record No. 2983-03-1 MEMORANDUM OPINION* PER CURIAM MARCH 2, 2004 CITY OF NORFOLK FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Andrew M. Sacks; Keith J. Leonard; Sacks & Sacks, on brief), for appellant. (Joan E. Mahoney, Assistant City Attorney, on brief), for appellee. Dianna L. Kay appeals a decision of the Workers Compensation Commission denying her claim for benefits because she failed to prove she sustained an injury by accident arising out of her employment on November 7, 2001. We have reviewed the record and the commission s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Kay v. Norfolk (City of) Police Dep t, VWC File No. 207-63-37 (Oct. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed. * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.