State of Utah v. Tijerina
Annotate this Case----ooOoo----
Dan Henry Tijerina, Sr.,
Petitioner and Appellant,
v.
State Board of Pardons,
Paul Sheffield, Gerald Cook,
and John Does,
Respondents and Appellees.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
(Not For Official Publication)
Case No. 20000548-CA
F I L E D
December 21, 2000
2000 UT App 376
-----
Third District, Salt Lake
Department
The Honorable J. Dennis
Frederick
Attorneys:
Dan Henry Tijerina, Sr.,
Draper, Appellant Pro Se
Jan Graham and Sharel S.
Reber, Salt Lake City, for Appellees
-----
Before Judges Jackson, Bench, and Billings.
PER CURIAM:
The trial court reentered the order dismissing Tijerina's petition for extraordinary relief so that he could file a timely notice of appeal. In spite of being given a second opportunity to perfect his appeal, Tijerina failed to file a timely notice of appeal from the reentered order. Tijerina claims he filed a timely notice of appeal with the Utah Supreme Court. However, there is no evidence to suggest he filed such a notice, and, even if he had, Utah Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) specifically requires that to be valid, a notice of appeal must be filed with the trial court. See also In re M.S., 781 P.2d 1287 (Utah Ct. App. 1989) (concluding notice of appeal filed in wrong court was not properly filed and was untimely).
Because Tijerina failed to
show excusable neglect or good cause for his late filing, and because the
trial court has "very broad discretion" in determining whether to grant
a Rule 4(e) motion for extension of time in which to file a notice of appeal,
we affirm the trial court. See Utah R. App. P. 4(e); Reisbeck
v. HCA Health Servs. of Utah Inc., 2000 UT 48,¶2, 2 P.3d 447 (stating
trial court's discretion to grant or deny rule 4(e) motion is very broad).
______________________________
Norman H. Jackson,
Associate Presiding Judge
______________________________
Russell W. Bench, Judge
______________________________
Judith M. Billings, Judge
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.