Harris v. DWS
Annotate this Case----ooOoo----
Todd G. Harris,
Petitioner and Appellant,
v.
Department of Workforce Services,
Workforce Appeals Board,
Respondent and Appellee.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
(Not For Official Publication)
Case No. 20000572-CA
F I L E D
November 16, 2000
2000 UT App 330
-----
Original Proceeding in this Court
Attorneys:
Todd G. Harris, Spanish
Fork, Appellant Pro Se
Lorin R. Blauer, Salt Lake
City, for Appellee
-----
Before Judges Greenwood, Orme, and Thorne.
PER CURIAM:
The court moved sua sponte for summary disposition of this appeal on the grounds that the court appeared to lack jurisdiction, as the petition was filed beyond the 30-day period allowed under rule 4(a) of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure.
The petition for review of the board's decision was filed 31 days after the decision was entered. "The timely filing of a petition for judicial review of an [administrative agency's] decision is jurisdictional. . . . Without a proper filing of a petition for review within 30 days of the Board's final decision, we are without jurisdiction to consider the appeal." Silva v. Department of Employment Security, 786 P.2d 246, 247 (Utah Ct. App. 1990) (citing Leonczynski v. Board of Review, 713 P.2d 706 (Utah 1985)).
There appears to be no exception
to this rigid rule, unfair though its application may be in a case like
this
one. Accordingly, we have
no alternative but to dismiss the appeal.
_____________________________
Pamela T. Greenwood,
Presiding Judge
_____________________________
Gregory K. Orme, Judge
_____________________________
William A. Thorne, Jr.,
Judge
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.