West Jordan City v. Emmertson
Annotate this Case----ooOoo----
West Jordan City,
Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Benjamin Emmertson,
Defendant and Appellant.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
(Not For Official Publication)
Case No. 20000272-CA
F I L E D
July 7, 2000
2000 UT App 214
-----
Third District, West Valley
Department
The Honorable Paul G. Maughan
Attorneys:
Benjamin J. Emmertson, Layton,
Appellant Pro Se
Ryan B. Carter, West Jordan
City, for Appellee
-----
Before Judges Greenwood, Davis, and Orme.
PER CURIAM:
A person not satisfied with
a judgment rendered in the justice court is entitled to a trial de novo
in the district court. See Utah Code Ann. § 78-5-120 (Supp.
1999). The judgment of the district court after trial de novo is final
and may not be appealed unless the constitutionality of a statute or ordinance
is ruled upon. See id. Appellant has already exercised his constitutional
right to appeal the justice court decision, receiving a trial de novo in
the district court. Appellant's attempts to pursue an appeal in this court
are ineffective under Utah law given that the constitutionality of a statute
or ordinance was not ruled upon below. We are without jurisdiction to entertain
the appeal and, accordingly, dismiss the appeal. See State v.
Hinson, 966 P.2d 273, 276 (Utah Ct. App. 1998).
______________________________
Pamela T. Greenwood,
Presiding Judge
______________________________
James Z. Davis, Judge
______________________________
Gregory K. Orme, Judge
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.