Ronald Reed v. Property Officer Mrs. Garrett, et alAppeal from 3rd District Court of Anderson County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-13-00243-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS RONALD REED, APPELLANT § APPEAL FROM THE 3RD V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PROPERTY OFFICER MRS. GARRETT, ET AL, APPELLEES § ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in this case was signed on June 18, 2013. The record was filed on August 14, 2013, making Appellant s brief due on September 13, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). The court received Appellant s brief on August 26, 2013, but the brief was defective. On August 26, 2013, Appellant was notified that the brief failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1, subsections (a), (b), (c), (f), (g), (h), (i), and (k). He was further notified that unless he filed a supplement to the brief to correct the defects on or before September 13, 2013, the brief would be returned to him and deemed past due, and the appeal would be presented to the court for dismissal for failure to timely file the brief. Appellant did not file a supplement to his brief, and the brief was returned to him on September 24, 2013. Appellant filed a response in which he indicated that he would not be filing the requested supplement. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure, after notice, to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Opinion delivered October 9, 2013. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT OCTOBER 9, 2013 NO. 12-13-00243-CV RONALD REED, Appellant V. PROPERTY OFFICER MRS. GARRETT, ET AL, Appellees Appeal from the 3rd District Court of Anderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 3-41916) THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c); and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.