In the Interest of M. R. R., a child v. --Appeal from County Court at Law of Smith County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 12-11-00372-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IWS GAS AND SUPPLY OF TEXAS LTD., SHAWN TINDALL, MICHAEL GEORGE AND JOHN ROGSTAD, APPELLANTS § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS V. MATHESON TRI-GAS, INC., APPELLEE MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Appellants and Appellee have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. In their motion, the parties state that they have agreed to settle and resolve all issues concerning this matter and appeal and therefore jointly move to dismiss the appeal. Because the parties have met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), the motion is granted, and the appeal, which is associated with the notices of appeal filed on November 17, 2011, and March 8, 2012, respectively, is dismissed with prejudice to refiling. Opinion delivered June 29, 2012. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J. (PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT JUNE 29, 2012 NO. 12-11-00372-CV IWS GAS AND SUPPLY OF TEXAS, LTD. SHAWN TINDALL, MICHAEL GEORGE AND JOHN ROGSTAD, Appellants V. MATHESON TRI-GAS, INC., Appellee ____________________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the 7th Judicial District Court of Smith County, Texas. (Tr. Ct. No. 2011-3048-A) __________________________________________________________________________ THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the joint motion of the Appellants and Appellee to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion is granted and this appeal be dismissed with prejudice; all costs of this appeal are assessed against the party incurring same; for which let execution issue; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.