Ismael Tierrablanca v. State of Texas--Appeal from 208th District Court of Harris County

NO. 12-01-00119-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS

ISMAEL TIERRABLANCA, APPEAL FROM THE 208TH

APPELLANT

 
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

 

PER CURIAM

Ismael Tierrablanca ("Appellant") pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual assault. The trial court deferred adjudication of guilt and placed Appellant under community supervision for six years. Subsequently, the State filed a motion to adjudicate guilt alleging that Appellant failed to perform the required community service and that Appellant had unsupervised contact with a minor. Appellant pleaded true to these allegations and the trial judge revoked Appellant's probation and sentenced Appellant to imprisonment for six years. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. Appellant's counsel filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). We affirm.

Analysis Pursuant to Anders v. California

Appellant's counsel filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969), stating that she has diligently reviewed the appellate record and is of the opinion that the record reflects no reversible error and that there is no error upon which an appeal can be predicated. Appellant's counsel further relates that she is well-acquainted with the facts in this case. In compliance with Anders, Gainous, and High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), Appellant's brief presents a chronological summation of the procedural history of the case, and a discussion of the hearing on adjudication, and further states that Appellant's counsel is unable to raise any arguable issues for appeal. (1) We have likewise reviewed the record for reversible error and have found none.

As required by Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991), Appellant's counsel has moved for leave to withdraw. We carried the motion for consideration with the merits of the appeal. Having done so and finding no reversible error, Appellant's counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is hereby granted and the trial court's order revoking appellant's probation is affirmed.

 

Opinion delivered February 20, 2002.

Panel consisted of Davis, C.J., Worthen, J., and Griffith, J.

 

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

1. Counsel for Appellant provided Appellant with a copy of this brief and Appellant was given time to file his own brief in this cause. The time for filing such a brief has expired and we have received no pro se brief.