IN RE: JESSE (JESUS) SOLIZ--Appeal from 28th District Court of Nueces County

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-10-00078-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE JESSE (JESUS) SOLIZ On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1 Relator, Jesse (Jesus) Soliz, pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on February 19, 2010, through which he seeks (1) to compel the trial court to set aside its order denying relator s motion for nunc pro tunc judgment; and (2) to 1 See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) ( W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand dow n an opinio n but is not required to do so. ); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions). compel the trial court to conduct a hearing on relator s motion for nunc pro tunc judgment and to permit relator s appearance at that hearing.2 The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX . R. APP. P. 52.8(a). PER CURIAM Do not publish. See TEX . R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 24th day of February, 2010. 2 Relator contends, generally, that the sentences im posed by his judgm ents in three causes should run concurrently rather than consecutively. These three causes have been previously presented to this Court. See generally Soliz v. State, No. 13-03-00473-CR, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 7383 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi Aug. 28, 2003, no pet.) (per curiam ) (m em . op. not designated for publication) (dism issing an appeal by request of appellant); Soliz v. State, No. 13-01-00540-CR, 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 2456 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi Apr. 4, 2002, no pet.) (per curiam ) (m em . op. not designated for publication) (dism issing an attem pted appeal from an order denying an application for writ of habeas corpus); Soliz v. State, 785 S.W .2d 438 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi 1990, no pet.) (affirm ing a conviction for felony burglary of a habitation). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.