IN RE: DAVID ANDREW DOUGLAS--Appeal from 343rd District Court of Bee County

NUMBER 13-07-698-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________

IN RE: DAVID ANDREW DOUGLAS

_______________________________________________________

 
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
_______________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Ya ez, Rodriguez, and Benavides
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (1)

On September 4, 2007, in the above cause, relator, David Andrew Douglas, filed a document titled "Notice and Demand Commercial Offer with Affidavit in Support" which we construe as a petition for writ of mandamus. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition, its attachments including an affidavit of default and stipulation commercial offer commercial law notice, an affidavit re[garding] denial of notary service, and an affidavit of service, as well as documents filed on November 13, 2007, including a commercial affidavit and two first notices of debt, and is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this 29th day of November, 2007.

1. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).