ALFREDO REGALADO INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A 4 ACES BAIL BONDS v. THE STATE OF TEXAS--Appeal from 398th District Court of Hidalgo County

Annotate this Case
NUMBER 13-07-00588-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

ALFREDO REGALADO, INDIVIDUALLY

AND D/B/A 4 ACES BAIL BONDS, APPELLANT,

 
v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

____________________________________________________________

 
On Appeal from the 398th District Court
of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

 
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellant, Alfredo Regalado, Individually and d/b/a 4 Aces Bail Bonds, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CR-0512-92-I(N). Judgment in this cause was signed on April 30, 2007. A motion for new trial was filed on May 29, 2007. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, appellant's notice of appeal was due on July 30, 2007, but was not filed until September 4, 2007.

On October 1, 2007, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant's failure to respond to this Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a)(c).

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 15th day of November, 2007.

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.