Huey T. Littleton Claims Service of Texas, Inc. and Texas Windstorm Insurance Association v. Jose G. Rodriguez and Delia Rodriguez, Individually and d/b/a Christina's Restaurant--Appeal from County Court at Law No 1 of Nueces County

Annotate this Case
NUMBER 13-07-166-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_____________________________________________________________

 

HUEY T. LITTLETON CLAIMS SERVICE OF TEXAS,

INC. AND TEXAS WINDSTORM INSURANCE

ASSOCIATION, Appellants,

 
v.

JOSE G. RODRIGUEZ AND DELIA RODRIGUEZ,

INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A CHRISTINA'S

RESTAURANT, Appellees.

____________________________________________________________

 
On appeal from County Court at Law No. 1
of Nueces County, Texas.

_____________________________________________________________

 
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellants, HUEY T. LITTLETON CLAIMS SERVICE OF TEXAS, INC. AND TEXAS WINDSTORM INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by County Court at Law No. 1 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 04-62149-1. After the record was filed, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to settlement. In the motion, appellants state that the parties participated in voluntary mediation, resulting in the successful compromise and settlement of all claims by and against all parties in the case. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, appellants request that the Court dismiss this appeal. In addition, appellants request that this Court release Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and all sureties on the supersedeas bond obtained by appellants in this cause, and that all costs of court be taxed against the party incurring same.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellants' motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

 

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 12th day of July, 2007.

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.