In Re: Joe Williamson Construction Company--Appeal from 139th District Court of Hidalgo County
Annotate this CaseCOURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
_________________________________________________________ _______
IN RE: JOE WILLIAMSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
___________________________________________________________ __
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
___________________________________________________________ _
MEMORANDUM OPINIONBefore Justices Ya ez, Rodriguez and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Relator, Joe Williamson Construction Company, filed a petition for writ of mandamus on August 4, 2006. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus with appendix, the response filed by real party in interest Raymondville Independent School District, and relator's reply to the response is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself entitled to the relief sought. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. 51.014(a)(4) (Vernon Supp. 2006) (providing that an appeal can be taken from an interlocutory order of a district court that grants a temporary injunction). Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
Furthermore, on August 4, 2006, this Court granted relator's motion to stay the trial court's order of July 17, 2006, setting the trial "on the 6th of Sept. 2006 at 9 o'clock a[.]m. with announcements on Aug. 31, 2006 at 9 o'clock a[.]m," in cause number C-738-06-C in Hidalgo County. Having denied the petition, the stay is hereby lifted.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 18th day of September, 2006.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.