JARETT ALEXANDER, JAMES C. MARTINEZ, A/K/A JIM MARTINEZ, AND JULIAN PUENTE, SR., INDIVIDUALLY, AND D/B/A ALEXANDER'S HOUSE LEVELING & FOUNDATION CO., A/K/A ALEXANDER'S GOOD FOUNDTION A/K/A ALEXANDER'S GULF HOUSE LEVELING, AND FOUNDATION REPAIR v. BARBARA OWENS--Appeal from 103rd District Court of Cameron County

Annotate this Case
NUMBER 13-01-802-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI

________________________________________________________________

 

JARRETT ALEXANDER, ET AL., Appellants,

 
v.

BARBARA OWEN, Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

 
On appeal from the 103rd District Court
of Cameron County, Texas

_______________________________________________________________

 
O P I N I O N
Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo
Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, JARRETT ALEXANDER, ET AL., attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2000-03-1116-D. Judgment in this cause was signed on July 31, 2001. A motion for new trial was untimely filed on September 5, 2001. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellants' notice of appeal was due on August 30, 2001, but was not filed until November 1, 2001.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellants.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants' failure to timely perfect their appeal, and appellants' failure to respond to this Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

 

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 21st day of February, 2002.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.