Cynthia Vaughn, D.C., Donald J. Daniels, D.C., Individually and d/b/a Daniels Chiropractic Clinic v. Susan F. Cole, D.C.--Appeal from 250th District Court of Travis County

Annotate this Case
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS,
AT AUSTIN
NO. 3-92-394-CV
CYNTHIA VAUGHN, D.C., DONALD J. DANIELS, D.C.,
INDIVIDUALLY AND d/b/a DANIELS CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC,

APPELLANTS

 
vs.
SUSAN F. COLE, D.C.,

APPELLEE

 
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 91-4168, HONORABLE PAUL R. DAVIS, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

PER CURIAM

 

This is a dismissal for want of prosecution.

Generally, an appellant must file his brief within thirty days after the filing of the transcript and statement of facts, if any. Tex. R. App. P. 74(k). If the appellant fails to file his brief within the prescribed time, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant shows a reasonable explanation for failing to file the brief and the appellee has not suffered material injury. Tex. R. App. P. 74(l)(1).

The transcript in this cause was filed on August 6, 1992. Appellants have not filed a statement of facts. Accordingly, appellants' brief was due thirty days after the filing of the transcript, on September 8, 1992. Appellants have not filed their brief. Moreover, appellants have not filed a motion for extension of time showing a reasonable explanation for their omission. See Tex. R. App. P. 74(n). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Dickson v. Dickson, 541 S.W.2d 895 (Tex. Civ. App. 1976, writ dism'd w.o.j.).

 

[Before Justices Powers, Aboussie and B. A. Smith]

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: October 21, 1992

[Do Not Publish]

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.