Jimmy Roger Oldham v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 204th District Court of Dallas County

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Nos. 10-94-078-CR & 10-94-079-CR

JIMMY ROGER OLDHAM,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 204th District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. F91-39487-VQ & F93-32050-JQ

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jimmy Roger Oldham appeals from two driving-while-intoxicated convictions. See Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. art. 6701l-1 (Vernon Supp. 1995) (current version at Tex. Penal Code Ann. 49.04 (Vernon 1994)). His retained attorney filed a motion to withdraw, premised on the attorney's conclusion that there are no complaints to be raised from Oldham's trial. See Oldham v. State, Nos. 10-94-078-CR & 10-94-079-CR (Tex. App. Waco, March 15, 1995) (interlocutory order) (not yet reported). We granted the motions to withdraw on March 21 after the attorney complied with our instructions. See id. slip op. at 3. Oldham's attorney informed him that he had thirty days from the date the attorney was allowed to withdraw to file a pro-se brief or a request for an extension of time to file a brief. See Johnson v. State, 885 S.W.2d 641, 647 & n.3 (Tex. App. Waco 1994) (interlocutory orders).

Oldham has not filed a pro-se brief on his own behalf. Thus, we are presented only with a brief which asserts that there are no arguable points of error in this appeal. Therefore, because we have no viable points of error to consider, the judgment is affirmed. See Tex. R. App. P. 81(b)(2), 90(a).

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Thomas,

Justice Cummings, and

Justice Vance

Affirmed

Opinion issued and filed May 3, 1995

Do not publish