Ex Parte James Lyle Melton--Appeal from 85th District Court of Brazos County

Annotate this Case
Ex parte Melton /**/

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

 

No. 10-94-033-CV

 

EX PARTE JAMES LYLE MELTON,

Appellant

 

From the 85th District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court # 39-289-85

 

O P I N I O N

 

James Lyle Melton appeals from an order denying his petition for expunction of arrest records relating to an aggravated assault charge. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 55.01 (Vernon Supp. 1994). Because he has failed to properly preserve the complaint, we will affirm the court's ruling.

In his petition, Melton alleged that he was arrested for aggravated assault, tried before a jury, and acquitted of aggravated assault even though he was convicted of assault by contact. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. 22.01(a)(3) (Vernon 1989). Melton argued that he was entitled to have the records of his arrest expunged because he was tried and acquitted of the offense. After a hearing, the court denied the petition by written order.

By a single point of error, Melton complains that "The trial court committed reversible error by denying appellant's petition for expunction of records as he was acquitted of the offense for which he was arrested." This point attacks the trial court's ruling on the petition; in effect, Melton is complaining that the court rendered an improper judgment. "The erroneous rendition of a final judgment is not fundamental error." Young v. Hodde, 682 S.W.2d 236, 237 (Tex. 1984). Thus, Melton was required to take some action in the trial court as a predicate to attacking the court's judgment on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 52(a). Although Rule 52 contains an exception for attacks on the court's factual findings after a bench trial, the general rule applies to attacks on the court's legal conclusions. See id. 52(d); Regan v. Lee, 879 S.W.2d 133, 136 (Tex. App. Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, n.w.h.). Thus, before Melton can complain about the court's rendition of judgment against him, he must first direct the court's attention to the asserted error by post-judgment objections or exceptions to the judgment or a motion for rehearing. See Winters v. Arm Refining Co., Inc., 830 S.W.2d 737, 738 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi 1992, writ denied). Because he failed to do so, he cannot now complain that the court erred in rendering its judgment. Melton's sole point is overruled. The judgment is affirmed.

 

BOB L. THOMAS

Chief Justice

 

Before Chief Justice Thomas,

Justice Cummings, and

Justice Vance

Affirmed

Opinion delivered and filed October 26, 1994

Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.