Nath v. Tex. Children’s Hosp. (Opinion)
Annotate this CaseThis suit was between a physician and other medical providers. Finding that Plaintiff-physician filed baseless pleadings in bad faith and with an improper purpose, the trial court imposed sanctions in excess of one million dollars. This was one of the highest reported monetary sanctions awards in Texas and the United States. The court of appeals affirmed the awards. The Supreme Court reversed, holding (1) due process requires that sanctions be just, meaning that there be a direct nexus between the sanction and the sanctionable conduct, and be visited on the true offender; (2) the trial court’s sanctions award in this case met due process requirements because Plaintiff’s pleadings asserted time-barred claims and address matters irrelevant to the lawsuit in an attempt to leverage a more favorable settlement; and (3) because the trial court, when assessing the amount of sanctions, failed to examine the extent to which Defendants bore some responsibility for the expenses they incurred in litigating a variety of issues for over four years, remand is required for the trial court to reassess the amount of the sanctions award.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.