Robert Lee Taylor v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 4th District Court of Rusk County

Annotate this Case

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

 

______________________________

 

No. 06-03-00241-CR

______________________________

 

ROBERT LEE TAYLOR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

 

On Appeal from the 4th Judicial District Court

Rusk County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR94-040

 

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Cornelius,* JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

 

_______________________________________

*William J. Cornelius, Chief Justice, Retired, Sitting by Assignment

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Robert Lee Taylor has filed a notice of appeal from an order of the 4th Judicial District Court of Rusk County, Texas, denying his motion to vacate his 1994 conviction. The motion essentially seeks to attack the statute under which he was convicted. In his motion, Taylor takes the position that the Texas Penal Code is not enforceable because it is published by West Publishing Company rather than by an officially accredited arm of the State of Texas.

The first question we address is whether we have jurisdiction. As a general rule, an appellate court may consider direct appeals by criminal defendants only after conviction. See Ex parte Shumake, 953 S.W.2d 842, 844 (Tex. App. Austin 1997, no pet.). The rules provide that a defendant must file his notice of appeal "within 30 days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after the day the trial court enters an appealable order . . . ." Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a) (emphasis added).

The right to appeal is conferred by the Legislature. See Rushing v. State, 85 S.W.3d 283, 286 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). A party may appeal only that which the Legislature has authorized. See Marin v. State, 851 S.W.2d 275, 278 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Galitz v. State, 617 S.W.2d 949, 951 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981) (op. on reh'g). The notice of appeal is not from a judgment of conviction. We have reviewed the order at bar and can find no authority that it is appealable. //

We have no jurisdiction over the appeal and therefore dismiss it.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

 

Date Submitted: November 17, 2003

Date Decided: November 18, 2003

 

Do Not Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.