Christopher D. Davis v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 102nd District Court of Bowie County

Annotate this Case
In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-03-00021-CR
______________________________
CHRISTOPHER DAVIS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 102nd Judicial District Court
Bowie County, Texas
Trial Court No. 96-F-10-102
Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Christopher Davis has filed a notice of appeal. He states in his notice that he is appealing from an order signed on December 16, 2002, by Judge John Miller of the 102nd Judicial District Court of Bowie County. In that order, Judge Miller denied Davis's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. The plea was entered on May 2, 1996.

The right to appeal is conferred by the Legislature. See Rushing v. State, 85 S.W.3d 283, 286 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). A party may appeal only that which the Legislature has authorized. See Marin v. State, 851 S.W.2d 275, 278 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Galitz v. State, 617 S.W.2d 949, 951 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Appellate jurisdiction is invoked by giving timely and proper notice of appeal. State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.3d 408, 410 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). Notice of appeal is sufficient if it is in writing and shows the party's desire to appeal from the judgment or appealable order. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a), (b); Alvorado v. State, 83 S.W.3d 203, 205 (Tex. App.-Amarillo 2002, no pet. h.).

The notice of appeal is not from a judgment of conviction. We have reviewed the order at bar and can find no authority permitting us to conclude that it is a type of order which the Legislature has set out as being appealable. We therefore have no jurisdiction over the appeal.

 

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

 

Jack Carter

Justice

 

Date Submitted: January 23, 2003

Date Decided: January 24, 2003

 

Do Not Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.