Randel Jay Riggins, a/k/a Randy Riggins, a/k/a R.J. Riggins, Virginia R. Riggins, JKR Operating, L.L.C., Riggins Petroleum, L.L.C., Riggins Pipeline, L.L.C., Kelsey Operating, Inc. and Riggins Energy, Inc. v. W.R. Doyle, Individually and as Trustee of the Nathan William Doyle Trust, Oklahoma Minerals Corporation and North Trend Leasing of Oklahoma Coporation--Appeal from 90th District Court of Young County

Annotate this Case
/**/

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-04-256-CV

RANDEL JAY RIGGINS A/K/A APPELLANTS

RANDY RIGGINS A/K/A R.J.

RIGGINS, VIRGINIA R. RIGGINS,

JKR OPERATING, L.L.C., RIGGINS

PETROLEUM, L.L.C., RIGGINS PIPELINE,

L.L.C., KELSEY OPERTING, INC., AND

RIGGINS ENERGY, INC.

V.

W.R. DOYLE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS APPELLEE

TRUSTEE OF THE NATHAN WILLIAM

DOYLE TRUST AND D/B/A RON=S

WELL SERVICE COMPANY, OKLAHOMA

MINERALS CORPORATION, AND NORTH

TREND LEASING OF OKLAHOMA CORPORATION

------------

FROM THE 90TH DISTRICT COURT OF YOUNG COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

------------

 

On October 28, 2004, we stayed this case and treated it as closed for administrative purposes because petitions for bankruptcy had been filed on September 23, 2004 by Appellants JKR Operating, L.L.C. and Kelsey Operating, Inc., in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas, Cause Nos. 04-70818-HDH-11 and 04-70817-HDH-11. On November 10, 2005, the parties notified this court that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court had entered a AFinal Judgment,@ an AOrder Dismissing Case,@ and an AOrder Granting Motion for Approval of Compromise and Settlement and Dismissing Bankruptcy Case Without Prejudice.@ The parties filed a AJoint Motion To Reinstate And Dismiss Appeal.@

We grant the motion. The appeal is ordered reinstated and is hereby dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3(a), 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL D: WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DELIVERED: December 8, 2005

 

[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.