In Re: Trust Created Under the Last Will and Testament of Leslie Duncan Maurer--Appeal from Probate Court No 1 of Bexar County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00754-CV IN RE Trust Created Under the Last Will and Testament of Leslie Duncan MAURER From the Probate Court No. 1, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-PC-3521 Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Delivered and Filed: December 29, 2010 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION On July 6, 2010, the trial court signed a final judgment in this case. On July 23, 2010, appellant filed a timely request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. Therefore, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on October 4, 2010. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). And, a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on October 19, 2010. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. However, appellant did not file its notice of appeal until October 20, 2010. Similarly, appellant did not file a motion for extension of time until October 20, 2010. 1 1 In its motion to extend time, appellant clearly states that the notice of appeal and the motion to extend time were filed on October 20, 2010. Likewise, the certificate of service on both the notice of appeal and motion to extend time indicate that the notice of appeal and motion to extend time were forwarded to opposing counsel on October 20, 2010. 04-10-00754-CV A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex.1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). But once the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate court=s jurisdiction. Id. Because appellant s motion to extend time to file its notice of appeal was untimely filed, we denied appellant s motion to extend time to file its notice of appeal on November 10, 2010. And, because appellant s notice of appeal was filed late and was not filed within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing by November 29, 2010 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
