Baldemar Hinojoza v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 144th Judicial District Court of Bexar County

MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-07-00148-CR
Baldemar HINOJOZA,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2005-CR-0080
Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

 

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

 

Delivered and Filed: November 14, 2007

 

AFFIRMED

Baldemar Hinojoza pled true to violating conditions of his community supervision in response to the State's motion to revoke community supervision. Hinojoza appeals from the revocation of his community supervision. Hinojoza's court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which she concludes that the appeal is without merit. A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to Hinojoza, who was advised of his right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Hinojoza did not file a pro se brief.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's Anders brief. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.

 

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

DO NOT PUBLISH