Daniel A. Lorenz v. Texas Workforce Commission and Wal-Mart Associates Inc.--Appeal from 216th Judicial District Court of Bandera County

Annotate this Case
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-07-00295-CV
Daniel A. LORENZ,
Appellant
v.
TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION and Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.,
Appellees
From the 216th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas
Trial Court No. 9197-04
Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

 

Sitting: Alma L. L pez, Chief Justice

Catherine Stone, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

 

Delivered and Filed: July 18, 2007

 

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Daniel A. Lorenz appeals the trial court's order denying his motion for a default judgment. With exceptions not applicable here, "an appeal may be prosecuted only from a final judgment." North East Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge, 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966). "[T]o be final a judgment must dispose of all issues and parties in a case." Id. The trial court's order denying Lorenz's motion for a default judgment does not dispose of all issues and parties in the case and is not an order subject to interlocutory appeal. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. 51.014 (Vernon Supp. 2006).

After the clerk's record was filed, we ordered Lorenz to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Lorenz did not file a response within the time provided. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

 

PER CURIAM

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.