Ramiro Muniz v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 379th Judicial District Court of Bexar County

Annotate this Case
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-04-00044-CR
Ramiro MUNIZ,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2002-CR-6886
Honorable Bert Richardson, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Alma L. L pez, Chief Justice

Sitting: Alma L. L pez, Chief Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 13, 2004

AFFIRMED

Ramiro Muniz ("Muniz") was convicted by a jury of two counts of sexual assault of a child and one count of prohibited sexual conduct. (1) Muniz appeals the judgments entered by the trial court on each of the counts.

Muniz's court-appointed attorney filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which she concludes that the appeal has no merit. Counsel provided Muniz with a copy of the brief and informed him of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1996, no pet.). On June 11, 2004, this court notified Muniz of the deadline to file his pro se brief; however, Muniz did not file a brief.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgments of the trial court are affirmed. Appellate counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.

Alma L. L pez, Chief Justice

DO NOT PUBLISH

1. The jury acquitted Muniz of a count of aggravated sexual assault of a child.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.