Andrew T. Vo d/b/a Larry Vo, Viet Le, Tam Van Le, and Vo-Le, Inc. v. Ho Kim Doan--Appeal from 129th District Court of Harris County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 4, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-09-01009-CV ____________ ANDREW T. VO d/b/a LARRY VO, VIET LE, TAM VAN LE, AND VO-LE, INC, Appellants V. HO KIM DOAN, Appellee On Appeal from the 129th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2007-19358 MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an attempted appeal from an order declaring a mistrial signed October 20, 2009. The clerk s record was filed on January 7, 2010. Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Interlocutory orders may be appealed only if permitted by statute. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). There is no statutory provision to appeal an order granting a mistrial. On January 12, 2010, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before January 25, 2010. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant filed a response acknowledging that no final judgment has been signed in this case. Appellant also stated he did not object to dismissal of the appeal, but he did not waive any other rights to seek review the trial court s order, including by petition for writ of mandamus. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Christopher. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
