Delfino Ruben Morales v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 339th District Court of Harris County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 14, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-09-01060-CR ____________ DELFINO RUBEN MORALES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 339th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1201106 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant entered a plea of guilty to murder. Appellant and the State agreed that appellant=s punishment would not exceed confinement in prison for more than thirty-five years. In accordance with the terms of this agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on November 5, 2009, to confinement for twenty-five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a timely, written notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal. 1 We lack jurisdiction over this attempted appeal from a plea bargain. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2) (stating defendant in plea-bargain case may appeal only matters raised by a written pre-trial motion or with the trial court=s permission). An agreement that places a cap on punishment is a plea bargain for purposes of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2). See Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (stating sentence-bargaining may be for recommendations to the court on sentences, including a recommended Acap@ on sentencing); Waters v. State, 124 S.W.3d 825, 826-27 (Tex. App.CHouston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. ref=d) (holding reviewing court lacked jurisdiction where defendant pled guilty with a sentencing cap of ten years). The trial court entered a certification of the defendant s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, the defendant has no right of appeal, and the defendant waived any right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2) (requiring the trial court to enter a certification of the defendant s right of appeal). The trial court s certification is included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports the trial court s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d) (requiring dismissal of the appeal where there is no certification showing the defendant has the right to appeal). PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Christopher. Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
