In Re: Troy Alan Stills Appeal from 397th Judicial District Court of Grayson County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed in part, Denied in part, and Opinion Filed September 18, 2017 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01079-CV IN RE TROY ALAN STILLS, Relator Original Proceeding from the 397th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 063589 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Brown, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Francis In this original proceeding, relator asks this Court to order the trial court to grant certain motions purportedly pending in the trial court, correct the degree of felony in his conviction, and reduce his sentence. This proceeding is a collateral attack on a final conviction and, therefore, falls within the scope of a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West 2015). Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final, post-conviction felony proceedings. Id; Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (orig. proceeding); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we dismiss this proceeding for want of jurisdiction to the extent relator attacks his final conviction. To the extent relator seeks only a writ directing the trial court to rule on certain motions, we deny the petition because relator has not provided the Court with a record establishing that the motions were properly filed and presented to the trial court, relator requested a hearing or ruling on the motions, and the trial court refused to rule or failed to rule within a reasonable time. As such, relator is not entitled to mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(a), 52.7(a); see also In re Harris, No. 14–07–231–CV, 2007 WL 1412105, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] May 15, 2007, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (holding relator not entitled to mandamus relief when record did not show relator alerted trial court of motion by setting it for submission or hearing). /Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE 171079F.P05 –2–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.