Tracy Nixon v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Corporation Appeal from 95th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion by chief justice wright)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed February 22, 2017 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01297-CV TRACY NIXON, Appellant V. GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-14373 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Appellant has been declared a vexatious litigant and is prohibited from filing pro se any new litigation in a court of this State without first obtaining permission from the local administrative judge. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.102(a), 11.103(a) (West Supp. 2016). By letter dated January 10, 2017, we instructed appellant to file, by January 20, 2017, an order signed by the local administrative judge giving appellant permission to file this appeal. By order dated February 6, 2017, we granted appellant’s motion for an extension of time and extended the deadline to February 13, 2017. In that order, we cautioned appellant that failure to file the requested order by the specified date will result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. As of today’s date, appellant has not filed an order signed by the local administrative judge giving him permission to file this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.1035(b) (West Supp. 2016). /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE 161297F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT TRACY NIXON, Appellant No. 05-16-01297-CV On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-14373. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating. V. GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. Judgment entered February 22, 2017. –3–
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
