JAY SANDON COOPER, Appellant v. WILLIAM B. COCHRAN (COURT APPOINTED RECEIVER/TRUSTEE), DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC., SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., JUANITA STRICKLAND, KENNETH STRICKLAND, CAROLYN A. TAYLOR, AND SANDRA L. DASIGENIS (SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES), Appellees

DISMISS; Opinion issued September 15, 2010
 
 
 
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
............................
No. 05-06-01540-CV
............................
JAY SANDON COOPER, Appellant
V.
WILLIAM B. COCHRAN (COURT APPOINTED RECEIVER/TRUSTEE),
DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC., SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.,
JUANITA STRICKLAND, KENNETH STRICKLAND, CAROLYN A. TAYLOR,
AND SANDRA L. DASIGENIS (SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES), Appellees
 
.............................................................
On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 05-11916
.............................................................
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices O'Neill and Myers
Opinion by Chief Justice Wright
 
        This appeal has been pending since November 15, 2006. On January 31, 2007, this Court abated the appeal to allow the trial court to review the record and enter an appropriate order on appellant's application for temporary injunction. On June 10, 2010, we reinstated the appeal. We noted that during the time the appeal was abated, we had no correspondence from the parties regarding this appeal. However, two other appeals involving the same trial court number were filed. Those appeals were docketed as cause no. 05-07-00307-CV, styled Hamilton County, et al. v. Jay Sandon Cooper, and cause no. 05-07-00760-CV, styled Jay Sandon Cooper v. William B. Cochran (Court Appointed Receiver/Trustee), et al. Both of these appeals have been disposed of and their mandates have issued. Therefore, by order dated June 10, 2010, we directed the parties to notify us in writing of why this appeal should not be dismissed.
        Appellant did not respond. Appellees Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. responded that the primary appeal related to appellant's claims was cause no. 05-07- 00760-CV, which has been finally disposed of. Appellees further stated there are no issues left to be resolved in this appeal given the disposition of the primary appeal.
        This case involved an interlocutory appeal from the trial court's ruling on a temporary injunction. Because a final judgment has been entered, this appeal is now moot. See Isuani v. Manske-Sheffield Radiology Group, P.A., 802 S.W.2d 235, 236-37 (Tex. 1991) (per curiam). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
 
 
                                                          
                                                          CAROLYN WRIGHT
                                                          CHIEF JUSTICE
 
061540F.P05