Korben Michael Czibik v. The State of Texas Appeal from 426th District Court of Bell County (opinion by chief justice mcclure)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS KORBEN MICHAEL CZIBIK, § No. 08-16-00188-CR § Appellant, Appeal from the § v. 426th District Court § of Bell County, Texas THE STATE OF TEXAS, § (TC# 75482) § Appellee. § MEMORANDUM OPINION Korben Michael Czibik appeals his conviction of aggravated sexual assault of a child. Appellant waived his right to a jury trial and entered an open plea of guilty. The trial court found Appellant guilty and assessed his punishment at imprisonment for a term of seventeen years. We affirm. FRIVOLOUS APPEAL Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he has concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 407 n.9 (Tex.Crim.App. 2008)(“In Texas, an Anders brief need not specifically advance ‘arguable’ points of error if counsel finds none, but it must provide record references to the facts and procedural history and set out pertinent legal authorities.”); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). Counsel has notified the Court in writing that he has delivered a copy of counsel’s brief and the motion to withdraw to Appellant, and he has advised Appellant of his right to review the appellate record and file a pro se brief. Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 318-20 (Tex.Crim.App. 2014)(setting forth duties of counsel). The Court granted Appellant’s motion for and provided him access to the record. We also granted Appellant an extension of time in which to file his pro se brief, but it has not been filed. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief, and we agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice January 18, 2017 Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ. Hughes, J., not participating (Do Not Publish) -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
