Cisneros, Pablo, Carmen Cisneros, Joel Cicneros, Arturo Cisneros, Maria Aragon, Ind., and Kathy Cisneros Orozco, Ind., and as next friend of Krystal Orozco, Sapphire Orozco, and as surviving parent of Emerald Orozco and Margarita Romo, Ind. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., Ford Motor Company, Mcree Ford and Rainbow Motors Corp.--Appeal from 394th District Court of Hudspeth County

Annotate this Case

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PABLO CISNEROS, CARMEN CISNEROS, JOEL CISNEROS, ARTURO CISNEROS, MARIA ARAGON, INDIVIDUALLY AND KATHY CISNEROS OROZCO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF KRYSTAL OROZCO, SAPPHIRE OROZCO, AND AS SURVIVING PARENT OF EMERALD OROZCO AND MARGARITA ROMA, INDIVIDUALLY,

Appellants,

v.

BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC., FORD MOTOR COMPANY, MCREE FORD, AND RAINBOW MOTORS, CORPORATION,

Appellees.

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

No.08-02-00219-CV

Appeal from the

394th Judicial District Court

of Hudspeth County, Texas

(TC# 3601-394)

O P I N I O N

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to dismiss pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), which states:

(b) If No Clerk=s Record Filed Due to Appellant=s Fault. If the trial court clerk failed to file the clerk=s record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk=s fee for preparing the clerk=s record, the appellate court mayBon a party=s motion or its own initiativeBdismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. The court must give the appellant a reasonable opportunity to cure before dismissal.

On August 30, 2002, pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), this Court=s clerk sent Appellants a notice of the Court=s intent to dismiss if, within ten days of the notice, the Appellants did not respond showing grounds to continue the appeal. Appellants wholly failed to respond.

The Court has considered this cause and concludes the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore dismiss the appeal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

October 3, 2002

RICHARD BARAJAS, Chief Justice

Before Panel No. 4

Barajas, C.J., Larsen, and McClure, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.