WILLIAM DALE CARTER, Relator v. STUART JENKINS, DIRECTOR OF PAROLE DIVISION, Respondent (Other)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-78,273-01 WILLIAM DALE CARTER, Relator v. STUART JENKINS, DIRECTOR OF PAROLE DIVISION, Respondent ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS FROM CONROE COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he is subject to parole supervision in Texas for a conviction from the state of Illinois, that he is being held in Conroe County Jail awaiting disposition of a motion to revoke his parole, and that the Parole Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice has failed to comply with the rules of the Interstate Compact for Probation and Parole Supervision. Specifically, Relator alleges that the hearing officer has not submitted a written report summarizing the preliminary hearing to officials in Illinois within ten days, as required by Rule 2 5.108(e) of the Interstate Compact for Probation and Parole Supervision. Because the required report has not been submitted to Illinois, Illinois officials have not notified Texas officials of a decision to retake or other action to be taken, and Relator continues to be held in Conroe County Jail. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the Director of the Parole Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, is ordered to file a response, stating whether Relator is currently being held in the Conroe County Jail pursuant to a pre-revocation warrant, and if so, stating whether the written report of the preliminary hearing conducted on July 5, 2012 has been submitted to Illinois officials. If no such report has been submitted, Respondent shall state why it has not been submitted. If the report has been submitted, and if more than 15 days have passed since its submission, Respondent shall state whether a response has been received from Illinois, and if so, what action, if any, has been taken pursuant to that response. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order. Filed: October 24, 2012 Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
