LUTHER BEN LONG, Relator v. HON. MOLLEE WESTFALL, JUDGE OF THE 371st DISTRICT COURT, Respondent (Other)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-77,715-01 LUTHER BEN LONG, Relator v. HON. MOLLEE WESTFALL, JUDGE OF THE 371st DISTRICT COURT, Respondent ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NOS. C-371-009194-1040300-A AND C-71-009194-1040360-A FROM TARRANT COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed applications1 for writs of 1 Relator apparently filed a single application challenging two convictions, which were tried and appealed together. Relator believed that he was litigating both convictions, but the District Clerk filed the application in only one cause number. Filing a single application challenging multiple convictions may render the application subject to dismissal under Tex. R. App. P. 73.1. However, the District Clerk in this instance marked out Cause No. 1040360 on the application, rendering the application compliant as to Cause No. 1040300. In the interest of fairness, the District Clerk may duplicate Relator s application, mark out Cause No. 1040300, and consider both applications as if they were received and filed on the same date. 2 habeas corpus in the 371st District Court of Tarrant County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the applications have not yet been forwarded to this Court. Relator contends that the district court entered an order designating issues on December 3, 2010. Respondent, the Judge of the 371st District Court of Tarrant County, shall file a response with this Court by having the District Clerk submit the record on such habeas corpus applications. In the alternative, Respondent may resolve the issues set out in the order designating issues and then have the District Clerk submit the record on such applications. In either case, Respondent s answer shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus will be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted her response. Filed: June 20, 2012 Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
