EX PARTE RAFAEL GUILLEN, Applicant (Other)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-77,584-01 EX PARTE RAFAEL GUILLEN, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 20070D05440 IN THE 205TH DISTRICT COURT FROM EL PASO COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital murder and was sentenced to life in prison. The Eighth Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Guillen v. State, No. 08-08-00241 (Tex. App. El Paso del. Jul. 28, 2010). Applicant, through habeas counsel, raises a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. He complains that trial counsel failed to object to portions of a detective s testimony as being inadmissible hearsay. Applicant argues that had an objection been lodged, the detective s testimony would not have been admitted, and the remaining evidence would have been insufficient to corroborate accomplice testimony linking Applicant to the crime. Applicant concludes that without -2the accomplice testimony, there was insufficient evidence of guilt and that a judgment of acquittal would have been ordered on direct appeal but for counsel s deficiency in not objecting. There is no response from trial counsel in the writ record or findings from the trial court, and a remand is necessary to develop the writ record before this Court. See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 285-86 (2000); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791, 795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant s claim of ineffective assistance and explain applicable strategy and tactical decisions. In doing so, the trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether habeas counsel continues to represent Applicant and, if not, whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the claims raised in the writ application. The trial court may also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant s claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: September 26, 2012 Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.