EX PARTE LUIS NAVA III, Applicant (Other)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-77,001-01 EX PARTE LUIS NAVA III, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 20050D05573 IN THE 384TH DISTRICT COURT FROM EL PASO COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of sexual assault of a child (count 1), sexual performance of a child (count 2), and possession of child pornography (count 3). He was sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment of seven years for the sexual assault and two years for the sexual performance; a two-year sentence for the pornography conviction was probated for two years. The Eighth Court of 2 Appeals affirmed the convictions in an unpublished opinion. Nava v. State, No. 08-08-00197-CR (Tex. App. El Paso del. Jun. 16, 2010). In several grounds, Applicant contends his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. There is no response from trial counsel regarding his investigation and trial strategy, and there are no findings from the trial court. As an initial matter, we note Applicant s allegations as they pertain to the probated count 3 are not properly before this Court and must be raised under Article 11.072 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. See T EX. C ODE C RIM. P ROC. Art. 11.07, §§ 1, 3(a)-(b). These allegations are therefore dismissed without prejudice. The allegations as they pertain to counts 1 and 2 are properly before this Court. Id. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall obtain an affidavit from Applicant s trial counsel responding to the claims and explaining his trial strategy and tactical decisions. In addition to obtaining this affidavit, the trial court may use any means set out in T EX. C ODE C RIM. P ROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d) to resolve disputed issues of fact. In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether applicant is indigent. If applicant is indigent and wishes to be 3 represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent applicant at the hearing. T EX. C ODE C RIM. P ROC. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the performance of Applicant s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel s deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant s claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court s supplemental findings of fact, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: February 1, 2012 Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
