EX PARTE TIMOTHY EDWARD SHAFFER, Applicant (Other)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-76,966-01 EX PARTE TIMOTHY EDWARD SHAFFER, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. F40654 IN THE 249TH DISTRICT COURT FROM JOHNSON COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of three counts of aggravated sexual assault and two counts of indecency with a child and was sentenced to imprisonment for three terms of sixty years and two terms of ten years. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Shaffer v. State, No. 14-09-00336-CR (Tex. App. Houston [14th Dist.] May 25, 2010, no pet.). Applicant contends, among other things, that the Johnson County District Attorney s Office breached a plea agreement made in Tarrant County. Under the terms of this agreement, Applicant 2 says he was to be sentenced to twenty years in the Johnson County causes. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order representatives from the District Attorney s Offices in Tarrant and Johnson Counties to state whether the Johnson County District Attorney s Office was a party to the plea agreement reached in Tarrant County. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, ยง 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. The trial court shall first make findings of fact as to whether the Johnson County District Attorney s Office was a party to the plea agreement reached in Tarrant County. If the trial court finds that it was a party, the trial court shall also make findings as to what the terms of the agreement were and whether Applicant or the Johnson County District Attorney s Office breached the agreement. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant s claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be 3 obtained from this Court. Filed: February 8, 2012 Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
