EX PARTE KEITH WAYNE FLAGG, Applicant (Other)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-76,428-01, WR-76,428-02, WR-76,428-03, WR-76,428-04, WR-76,428-05 & WR-76,428-06 EX PARTE KEITH WAYNE FLAGG, Applicant ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 63248, 67465, 67466, 67558, 67569 & 63299 IN THE 291ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant entered open pleas of guilty to one charge of failure to register as a sex offender, two charges of aggravated sexual assault of a child, and three charges of indecency with a child. He was sentenced to ten years imprisonment for the failure to register offense, and consecutive life sentences for each of the other offenses. imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Flagg v. State, Nos. 05-0800019-CR, 05-08-00021-CR, 05-08-00022-CR, 05-08-00023-CR, 05-08-00024-CR & 05-08-00020- 2 CR (Tex. App. Dallas, February 3, 2009, pet. ref d). Applicant contends that he was not competent to enter his pleas, and that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to have him evaluated for competency and sanity. The trial court held a habeas hearing on June 1, 2011, and subsequently entered findings of fact and conclusions of law, recommending that relief be denied. The trial court s findings of fact and conclusions of law make specific reference to the habeas hearing, and cite to specific pages of the transcript of that hearing. However, no transcript of the habeas hearing was included in the habeas record. The trial court shall supplement the habeas record with a transcript of the habeas hearing in these cases. These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has supplemented the record. A supplemental transcript shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: January 25, 2012 Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
