GILBERTO CHAVERO, JR., Relator v. HIDALGO COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent (Other)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-76,228-02 GILBERTO CHAVERO, JR., Relator v. HIDALGO COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. CR-0960-96-B IN THE 93RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM HIDALGO COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the 93rd Judicial District Court of Hidalgo County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the application has not yet been forwarded to this Court. Relator also alleges that he filed a motion for appointment of counsel for the purpose of post-conviction DNA testing under Tex. Code Crim. 2 Proc. art. 64.01, but that the trial court refuses to rule on that motion. This Court received Relator s 11.07 habeas application on August 1, 2011, and therefore Relator has not demonstrated that the Hidalgo County District Clerk had violated a ministerial duty under Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07 §3. With respect to Relator s claim under Chapter 64, when a court of appeals and this Court have concurrent, original jurisdiction of a petition for a writ of mandamus against the judge of a district or county court, the petition should be presented first to the court of appeals unless there is a compelling reason not to do so. Padilla v. McDaniel, 122 S.W.3d 805, 808 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Leave to file is denied. Filed: April 18, 2012 Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.