EX PARTE LUIS RAUL CAMACHO, Applicant (Other)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-71,916-03 EX PARTE LUIS RAUL CAMACHO, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 73784 IN THE 41ST DISTRICT COURT FROM EL PASO COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty on May 10, 1996, to aggravated assault on a police officer and was placed on ten years community supervision. According to the judgment, the State filed a motion to revoke the community supervision within the supervision period on September 23, 2003. The community supervision was not revoked, however, until July 5, 2006, which is after the supervision period appears to have ended. In this writ application, Applicant complains he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel because counsel did not argue the State s lack of due diligence in timely seeking the revocation of Applicant s community supervision. 2 Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791, 795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). There is no response from counsel in the record provided to this Court, and there are no findings from the trial court. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant s claim of ineffective assistance by explaining counsel s representation of Applicant, including applicable strategy and tactical decisions. To obtain the response, the trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, ยง 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the claim raised in the writ application. The trial court may also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant s claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: September 12, 2012 Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
