DARRELL WAYNE STANLEY, Relator v. BELL COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent (Dissenting)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,929 DARRELL WAYNE STANLEY, Relator v. BELL COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. 49316 IN THE 264 TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY K ELLER, P.J., filed a dissenting opinion in which K EASLER, H ERVEY, and A LCALĂ , JJ., joined. Applicant attached extra pages to the Article 11.07 form. Two of those extra pages amplify his answer to question 14(c), which asks why he did not raise his current claims in his previously filed application. Instruction 5 clearly prohibits this, stating in relevant part: You may use additional pages only if you need them for item 17, the facts supporting your ground for relief. Do not attach any additional pages for any other item 17. 1 The district clerk should not be faulted for 1 Article 11.07 form, instruction 5. Applicant also attached some extra pages in connection with some of his grounds under item 17. Those extra pages, though on notebook paper rather than a copy of pages from the form, are in compliance with our instructions. STANLEY 2 returning a habeas application as non-compliant when the application is in fact non-compliant under our instructions. Under these circumstances, I cannot agree that the district clerk has violated a ministerial duty. Applicant could bring his application into compliance by omitting the two pages. If he believes it necessary, he could state on the form a brief summary of his answer to question 14(c) and amplify his answer in a memorandum. With these comments, I respectfully dissent. Filed: December 12, 2012 Publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
