EX PARTE DAVID CLAYTON RATLIFF, Applicant (Other)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-67,060-04 EX PARTE DAVID CLAYTON RATLIFF, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR-08-0234 IN THE 43RD DISTRICT COURT FROM PARKER COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Ratliff v. State, 320 S.W.3d 857 (Tex. App. Ft. Worth 2010). Applicant contends, inter alia, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by not speaking with him before the day of trial, by not timely investigating a possible witness, by failing to convey a fourteen year plea offer from the State, and by having Applicant reveal his tattoos to the jury panel. 2 Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall obtain a response from Applicant s trial counsel regarding Applicant s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, ยง 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the performance of Applicant s trial attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel s deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall make specific findings as to whether counsel communicated with Applicant prior to trial, whether a fourteen year offer was made by the State, and if so, whether that offer was conveyed to Applicant. The trial court shall also determine whether counsel revealed Applicant s tattoos to the jury panel, and if so, whether counsel had a valid strategic reason to do so and whether Applicant was harmed by such action. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant s claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all 3 affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: November 9, 2011 Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
