& EX PARTE SHAUNTEL LORAINE MAYO (other)

Annotate this Case
Texas Judiciary Online - HTML Opinion     Close This Window

















IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NOS. AP-76,637, AP-76,638 & AP-76,639

EX PARTE SHAUNTEL LORAINE MAYO, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 241-1431-07, 241-1436-07 & 241-1437-07

IN THE 241ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM SMITH COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of engaging in organized criminal activity and two counts of sexual performance by a child. She was sentenced to imprisonment for life and two terms of twenty years. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed her convictions. Mayo v. State, Nos. 14-08-00622-CR, 14-08-00623-CR & 14-08-00624-CR (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] June 17, 2010, no pet.).

Applicant contends, among other things, that the State violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S. Ct. 1194, 10 L. Ed. 2d 215 (1963), by failing to disclose exculpatory evidence. The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended that we grant relief. Relief is granted. The judgments of conviction in cause numbers 241-1431-07, 241-1436-07, and 241-1437-07 from the 241st District Court of Smith County are set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Smith County to answer the charges as set out in the indictments. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: September 14, 2011

Do Not Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.